Karnataka High Court
Criminal LawAdministrative and Public Law

General parole cannot exceed 90 days under the Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual.

SRI SEGABANDI BHASKARA CHARY vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 05, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
General parole cannot exceed 90 days under the Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual.. SRI SEGABANDI BHASKARA CHARY vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner, a convicted prisoner whose appeal was pending, had been granted 60 days’ general parole from 9 July to 7 September 2026 and a further 30 days from 8 September to 7 October 2026.

Source reference: pp. 4–7, paras. 5–7

He sought a further 30-day extension from 8 October, citing his mother’s eye surgery on 16 September 2026; his counsel asked the Court to consider two weeks instead.

Source reference: pp. 2–3, paras. 2, 8–9

The State opposed the request on the ground that the petitioner had exhausted the maximum 90-day parole period.

Source reference: p. 3, para. 3
02

Issues

Whether the petitioner’s general parole could be extended beyond 90 days under the applicable prison rules.

Source reference: pp. 8–9, paras. 10–12

Whether the petitioner’s mother’s eye surgery provided sufficient grounds for a further parole extension.

Source reference: pp. 7–9, paras. 8–12
03

Law Applied

The petition invoked the High Court’s jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

Source reference: p. 2

The Court applied Clause 640 of Chapter XXXIV of the Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual, 2021, which permits general parole initially for up to 30 days, extendable by up to a further 60 days, subject to a total maximum of 90 days; the Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services is the competent authority to grant general parole.

Source reference: p. 8, paras. 10–11

The 2021 Manual had replaced the Karnataka Prison Manual, 1978.

Source reference: p. 8, para. 10
04

Reasoning

The petitioner had already received the maximum 90 days of parole permitted by Clause 640.

Source reference: pp. 7–9, paras. 7–12

Although his mother underwent eye surgery while he was on parole, and he had cared for her from the date of surgery until his parole ended, the Court held that this circumstance did not justify an extension beyond the Manual’s prescribed maximum.

Source reference: p. 8, para. 9; p. 9, para. 12
05

Holding

The Court rejected the writ petition as devoid of merit, finding no basis to extend parole beyond the 90-day limit.

It directed the petitioner to surrender before the prison authorities on 7 October 2026.

Source reference: p. 9, para. 13
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI SEGABANDI BHASKARA CHARYvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment