Karnataka High Court
Administrative and Public LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Government employees seeking regularisation must pursue their claims before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal.

ANITA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20261 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Government employees seeking regularisation must pursue their claims before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal.. ANITA vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioners, who claimed to be working as Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in Government hospitals, sought reconsideration of their claims for regularisation or absorption, relying on representations dated 22 June 2026 and 24 August 2026 and citing earlier decisions on regularisation.

Source reference: p. 7–10

The State’s Additional Government Advocate objected that the petitioners should pursue their claims before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT) under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.

Source reference: p. 10–11

The Court disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits of the regularisation claims.

Source reference: p. 11
02

Issues

1. Whether the petitioners’ claims for regularisation or absorption in Government service should be pursued before the KSAT under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

Source reference: p. 10–11

2. Whether the writ petition should be entertained, or disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the KSAT

Source reference: p. 10–11
03

Law Applied

Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was identified as providing the route to the KSAT for the service-related claims in question.

Source reference: p. 10–11

The Court did not discuss or apply the regularisation principles or precedents cited by the petitioners; it made no determination on the merits of their claims.

Source reference: p. 9–11
04

Reasoning

The Court considered the nature of the relief sought and the petitioners’ assertion that they worked as nurses in Government hospitals.

Source reference: p. 10–11

It agreed with the State’s preliminary objection that they should file an application before the KSAT, rather than pursue the claims in the writ petition.

Source reference: p. 10–11

The Court did not assess the petitioners’ eligibility for regularisation or the merits of the authorities cited in support of their claims.

Source reference: p. 9–11
05

Holding

The Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioners liberty to file an appropriate application before the KSAT.

The regularisation and absorption claims were left open for consideration before that forum.

Source reference: p. 11
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

ANITAvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment