Facts
The petitioners, who claimed to be working as Auxiliary Nurse Midwives in Government hospitals, sought reconsideration of their claims for regularisation or absorption, relying on representations dated 22 June 2026 and 24 August 2026 and citing earlier decisions on regularisation.
Source reference: p. 7–10The State’s Additional Government Advocate objected that the petitioners should pursue their claims before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT) under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Source reference: p. 10–11The Court disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits of the regularisation claims.
Source reference: p. 11Issues
1. Whether the petitioners’ claims for regularisation or absorption in Government service should be pursued before the KSAT under Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
Source reference: p. 10–112. Whether the writ petition should be entertained, or disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the KSAT
Source reference: p. 10–11Law Applied
Section 15 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 was identified as providing the route to the KSAT for the service-related claims in question.
Source reference: p. 10–11The Court did not discuss or apply the regularisation principles or precedents cited by the petitioners; it made no determination on the merits of their claims.
Source reference: p. 9–11Reasoning
The Court considered the nature of the relief sought and the petitioners’ assertion that they worked as nurses in Government hospitals.
Source reference: p. 10–11It agreed with the State’s preliminary objection that they should file an application before the KSAT, rather than pursue the claims in the writ petition.
Source reference: p. 10–11The Court did not assess the petitioners’ eligibility for regularisation or the merits of the authorities cited in support of their claims.
Source reference: p. 9–11Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, granting the petitioners liberty to file an appropriate application before the KSAT.
The regularisation and absorption claims were left open for consideration before that forum.
Source reference: p. 11Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Administrative Tribunals Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
ANITAvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
