Facts
The applicant, a 39-year-old Senior Executive, was arrested on March 13, 2026, in connection with Crime No. 304/2023.
Source reference: para. 1, 6The prosecution alleged that while working for Fullerton India Credit Company Ltd., the applicant conspired with co-accused Amit Garg to sanction personal loans for three individuals based on forged salary slips.
Source reference: para. 6The applicant contended he was merely a salaried employee responsible for data entry and that the loans were sanctioned by other bank officials.
Source reference: para. 4He further argued that the evidence is primarily documentary and already seized.
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, considering the nature of the allegations and the status of the investigation.
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the grant of regular bail.
Source reference: para. 1Section 120-B, 420, 467, and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, concerning criminal conspiracy, cheating, and forgery.
Source reference: para. 1Section 346 of the BNSS (formerly Section 309 of the Cr.P.C.) regarding the timely examination of witnesses during trial.
Source reference: para. 9(5)Reasoning
The court observed that the applicant has been in judicial custody since March 13, 2026, and that the investigation regarding him is "almost complete".
Source reference: para. 6Although the State opposed bail due to the gravity of the offense, it conceded that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para. 5, 6The court found that the applicant’s contentions—specifically that the money trail is documented and seized—had prima facie merit.
Source reference: para. 6It reasoned that since the trial would take time to conclude and the applicant has family responsibilities, there was no compelling reason for continued incarceration.
Source reference: para. 7The court determined there was no substantial risk of the applicant fleeing justice, tampering with evidence, or repeating the offense given his socio-economic status.
Source reference: para. 7Holding
The Court allowed the application and directed the release of the applicant on bail.
The holding is contingent upon the applicant furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with one surety of the same amount.
Source reference: para. 9The grant of bail is subject to several conditions, including regular appearance at hearings, non-interference with witnesses, and compliance with Section 346 of the BNSS regarding the examination of witnesses.
Source reference: para. 9The order remains effective until the conclusion of the trial unless breached.
Source reference: para. 10Original Court PDF
Mahesh KoshtavsThe State Of Madhya Pradesh
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in