Facts
The applicant, Harshit Saxena, was arrested on 05.01.2026 in connection with Crime No. 13/2026 at Police Station Basna
Source reference: para 1, 2The prosecution alleged that following a raid based on classified information, the investigating officer seized 10.450 kilograms of Cannabis (Ganja) from the joint possession of the applicant and two co-accused
Source reference: para 2The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, contending that he was falsely implicated, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the quantity seized was below the commercial threshold
Source reference: para 1, 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the quantity of contraband seized and the lack of criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para 3-6Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, regarding the possession of cannabis
Source reference: para 1it further applied the threshold for "commercial quantity" as prescribed in the NDPS Schedule, noting that for Ganja, the commercial quantity is more than 20 kgs; consequently, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act—which restrict bail for commercial quantities—do not apply to seizures below that limit
Source reference: para 3, 6Procedurally, the application was moved under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
Source reference: para 1Reasoning
The court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized from the joint possession of the three accused was 10.450 kilograms
Source reference: para 6Since this amount falls significantly below the 20-kilogram threshold for commercial quantity, the stringent statutory bars against bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not triggered
Source reference: para 3, 6The court noted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents and had been in custody since January 2026
Source reference: para 3, 6Furthermore, since the charge-sheet was already filed, the court determined that custodial interrogation was no longer necessary and that the trial would likely consume considerable time
Source reference: para 2, 6Holding
The court allowed the application and granted regular bail to Harshit Saxena
The holding established that because the seized contraband was of a non-commercial quantity and the applicant had no criminal history, bail was warranted
Source reference: para 6The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory attendance at trial dates and strict compliance with Sections 209, 269, and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita/BNSS
Source reference: para 7Acts & Sections Cited
7 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20233
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19852
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20232
Original Court PDF
HARSHIT SAXENAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
