Facts
The applicant, Harshit Saxena, was arrested on 05.01.2026 in connection with Crime No. 13/2026 at Police Station Basna
Source reference: para 1, 2The prosecution alleged that following a raid based on classified information, the investigating officer seized 10.450 kilograms of Cannabis (Ganja) from the joint possession of the applicant and two co-accused
Source reference: para 2The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, contending that he was falsely implicated, the charge-sheet had been filed, and the quantity seized was below the commercial threshold
Source reference: para 1, 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the quantity of contraband seized and the lack of criminal antecedents.
Source reference: para 3-6Law Applied
The court primarily applied Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, regarding the possession of cannabis
Source reference: para 1it further applied the threshold for "commercial quantity" as prescribed in the NDPS Schedule, noting that for Ganja, the commercial quantity is more than 20 kgs; consequently, the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act—which restrict bail for commercial quantities—do not apply to seizures below that limit
Source reference: para 3, 6Procedurally, the application was moved under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
Source reference: para 1Reasoning
The court observed that the total quantity of Ganja seized from the joint possession of the three accused was 10.450 kilograms
Source reference: para 6Since this amount falls significantly below the 20-kilogram threshold for commercial quantity, the stringent statutory bars against bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not triggered
Source reference: para 3, 6The court noted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents and had been in custody since January 2026
Source reference: para 3, 6Furthermore, since the charge-sheet was already filed, the court determined that custodial interrogation was no longer necessary and that the trial would likely consume considerable time
Source reference: para 2, 6Holding
The court allowed the application and granted regular bail to Harshit Saxena
The holding established that because the seized contraband was of a non-commercial quantity and the applicant had no criminal history, bail was warranted
Source reference: para 6The applicant was ordered to be released upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory attendance at trial dates and strict compliance with Sections 209, 269, and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita/BNSS
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
HARSHIT SAXENAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in