Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of bail for possession of 9.8 kg cannabis as quantity falls below commercial threshold.

Aman @ Shubham Rajput v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 2231 of 2026 (2026:CGHC:11448)]

Chhattisgarh High Court2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on November 16, 2025, in connection with Crime No. 111/2025 at P.S. Purur, District Balod.

Source reference: para 1-2

The police intercepted a vehicle and recovered 9.8 kilograms of cannabis (Ganja); the owner of the vehicle (main accused Sagar Yadav) fled the scene, while the applicant, who was sitting on the pillion seat, was apprehended.

Source reference: para 2

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, contending he was merely a passenger with no knowledge of the contraband.

Source reference: para 1-2

The charge-sheet has been filed, and the applicant has been in custody since the date of arrest.

Source reference: para 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, given that the quantity of contraband seized is less than the commercial quantity.

Source reference: para 1, 3, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court primarily applied Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, regarding the possession of Ganja.

Source reference: no citation

It specifically considered the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which restricts bail in cases involving "commercial quantity".

Source reference: para 3

Under the NDPS Act Schedule, the commercial quantity for Ganja is prescribed as more than 20 kgs.

Source reference: para 3

Procedurally, the court applied Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding powers of the High Court to grant bail.

Source reference: para 1
04

Reasoning

The Court observed that the 9.8 kgs of Ganja seized from the applicant’s possession is significantly lower than the 20 kg threshold required to constitute a "commercial quantity".

Source reference: para 3, 6

Consequently, the stringent bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply.

Source reference: para 3

The Court further noted that the investigation is complete as the charge-sheet has already been filed, and the applicant has no prior criminal antecedents.

Source reference: para 3-4

Given that the applicant has been in jail since November 16, 2025, and that the trial is likely to be prolonged, the Court determined that further incarceration was not warranted.

Source reference: para 6
05

Holding

The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and granted regular bail to the applicant.

The holding is that the rigors of Section 37 NDPS do not apply to sub-commercial quantities, making the applicant eligible for bail when coupled with a lack of criminal history and the filing of a charge-sheet.

Source reference: para 3, 6

The applicant was ordered to be released on a personal bond with two sureties, subject to conditions including mandatory attendance at trial, no seeking of adjournments, and compliance with Sections 269 and 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) regarding non-appearance.

Source reference: para 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

Aman @ Shubham Rajput v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 2231 of 2026 (2026:CGHC:11448)]

Chhattisgarh High Court

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment