Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of bail for possession of intermediate quantity of contraband where Section 37 NDPS rigours are not attracted.

SAHIL MASIH vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 20, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on 30.01.2026 following a police raid at Forest Naka, Sirpur. Acting on secret information, police intercepted the applicant and a co-accused on a motorcycle and allegedly recovered 09 kilograms of contraband ganja from their joint possession

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was charged under Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985

Source reference: para 1

The applicant moved this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, contending he was falsely implicated, the investigation (charge-sheet) was complete, and the seized quantity was non-commercial

Source reference: para 3
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering the quantity of contraband seized and his criminal history

Source reference: para 6
03

Law Applied

Section 20(B) of the NDPS Act, 1985, regarding the possession of contraband

Source reference: para 1

Rigours of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, which restricts bail in cases involving "commercial quantities" of narcotics

Source reference: para 3

Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (the successor to Section 439 of the CrPC), regarding the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para 1

Sections 84, 209, 269, and 351 of the BNSS and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) to stipulate conditions for the continued liberty of the accused

Source reference: para 7
04

Reasoning

The court observed that the 09 kilograms of ganja seized was below the "commercial quantity" threshold defined under the NDPS Act, meaning the stringent statutory bars to bail under Section 37 did not strictly apply

Source reference: para 3, 6

The court noted that the applicant had no prior criminal antecedents and had been in judicial custody since 30.01.2026

Source reference: para 6

Since the charge-sheet had already been filed and the trial was expected to take considerable time, the court reasoned that continued pre-trial detention was unnecessary

Source reference: para 6

The court balanced the state’s opposition against the applicant's right to liberty, concluding that the lack of criminal history and the nature of the quantity justified the grant of bail subject to strict procedural safeguards to ensure trial attendance

Source reference: para 7
05

Holding

The court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Sahil Masih upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties

The holding is contingent on several conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must appear on all trial dates, and must personally appear for the framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS. Failure to comply may result in proceedings under Sections 209 or 269 of the BNS

Source reference: para 7(i-iv)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

SAHIL MASIHvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 20, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment