Facts
The applicant filed a First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking regular bail following his arrest on December 1, 2025.
Source reference: para 1, 6The prosecution alleged that on November 30, 2025, the applicant's associate assaulted a complainant with a knife while the applicant was present during a physical altercation near Nehru Chowk.
Source reference: para 2The applicant contended he was falsely implicated while attempting to settle a dispute and that a knife recovery was fabricated.
Source reference: para 3He further sought parity with a co-accused who was granted bail in January 2026.
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail considering the nature of the injuries, the duration of incarceration, and the principle of parity?
Source reference: para 3, 6Law Applied
Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (formerly Section 439 of the CrPC) regarding the High Court's power to grant bail.
Source reference: para 1Substantive charges were registered under Sections 109(1) (Punishment of abetment), 296 (Obscene acts and songs), 115(2) (Voluntarily causing hurt), 324(2) (Voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons), and 3(5) (Acts done by several persons in furtherance of common intention) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, along with Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act.
Source reference: para 1The court also referenced the principle of parity based on the prior release of a co-accused in MCRC No. 641/2026.
Source reference: para 3Reasoning
The Court evaluated the gravity of the offence against the medical evidence (MLC), noting that the injuries sustained by the victim were "simple in nature".
Source reference: para 6It observed that the investigation was effectively complete as the charge-sheet had already been filed before the competent court.
Source reference: para 6The Court took into account that the applicant had been in custody since December 1, 2025, and that the trial was likely to be protracted.
Source reference: para 6The Court accepted the applicant’s plea for parity with the co-accused who had been previously granted bail.
Source reference: para 3, 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative, granting relief based on the nature of injuries and the status of the trial.
The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant, B Sonu, upon furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including a prohibition on seeking unnecessary adjournments, mandatory presence at trial under penalty of Section 269 of the BNS, and adherence to proceedings under Section 84 of the BNSS if the liberty is misused.
Source reference: para 7Original Court PDF
B SONUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in