Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of bail where accused is implicated solely via co-accused's memorandum statement without prior criminal record.

Jitendra Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 2228 of 2026 (2026:CGHC:11449)]

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: no citation2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

On November 17, 2025, approximately 6-7 individuals allegedly entered the residence of complainant Dilip Rathore, impersonating Income Tax officers to conduct an unauthorized search without a warrant.

Source reference: para 2

No property was stolen during the incident.

Source reference: para 2

An FIR was lodged on December 12, 2025, against unknown persons.

Source reference: para 2

The applicant was arrested on December 16, 2025, based on a memorandum statement of a co-accused.

Source reference: para 3

The applicant filed this First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Source reference: para 1
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail considering the nature of the allegations and the evidentiary basis of his implication.

Source reference: paras 3 & 6
03

Law Applied

The Court considered Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, regarding the High Court’s power to grant bail.

Source reference: para 1

The charges were registered under Sections 204 (impersonating a public servant), 319(2) (cheating by personation), 331(3) (house-trespass for offense punishable with imprisonment), 61(2) (criminal conspiracy), and 3(5) (common intention) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.

Source reference: para 1

The court applied general principles of bail jurisprudence, focusing on the absence of criminal antecedents, the period of incarceration, and the filing of the charge-sheet.

Source reference: para 6
04

Reasoning

The Court analyzed the applicant's involvement and noted that he was not named in the initial FIR and was implicated solely through a co-accused’s memorandum statement.

Source reference: para 3

The Court observed that the investigation was substantially complete as the charge-sheet had already been filed.

Source reference: para 3, 6

Furthermore, the Court highlighted that the applicant had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since December 16, 2025.

Source reference: para 6

Given that the trial was likely to be protracted, the Court reasoned that continued detention was unnecessary.

Source reference: para 6
05

Holding

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Jitendra Baghel on a personal bond with two sureties.

The holding was contingent upon several conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments.

Source reference: para 7(i)

The applicant must appear for all court dates or face proceedings under Section 269 of the BNS.

Source reference: para 7(ii)

The applicant must be present for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 of the BNSS.

Source reference: para 7(iv)

Failure to comply with bail conditions or absconding would trigger proceedings under Sections 84 and 209 of the BNSS/BNS.

Source reference: para 7(iii)
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

Jitendra Baghel v. State of Chhattisgarh [MCRC No. 2228 of 2026 (2026:CGHC:11449)]

Chhattisgarh High Court · no citation

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment