Facts
The applicant was arrested on 13.02.2026 in connection with Crime No. 75/2026 at Police Station Mahasamund
Source reference: para. 2, 3Following an informant's tip, police conducted a raid and seized 24 bulk liters of country-made liquor from the applicant's possession
Source reference: para. 2The applicant was charged under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act
Source reference: para. 1The applicant approached the High Court seeking regular bail, contending he was falsely implicated and had no criminal history
Source reference: para. 3The State opposed the bail, citing the quantity of liquor seized
Source reference: para. 4Issues
Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the nature of the offense and the period of incarceration
Source reference: para. 1, 6Law Applied
The Court applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant bail
Source reference: para. 1Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, noting the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years
Source reference: para. 3procedural requirements for bail conditions under Sections 269 (non-attendance), 84 (proclamation for person absconding), 209 (failure to appear), and 351 (recording of statement) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations against the applicant's personal circumstances.
Source reference: no citationIt noted that the quantity seized was 24 bulk liters and that the charge-sheet had already been filed, reducing the risk of tampering with the investigation
Source reference: para. 4, 6Significant weight was given to the fact that the applicant had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 13.02.2026
Source reference: para. 6Given that the maximum sentence for the offense is three years and the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court determined that continued pretrial detention was not necessary, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant's participation in the trial
Source reference: para. 3, 6, 7Holding
the absence of criminal antecedents and the filing of the charge-sheet merit the grant of bail in matters involving Section 34(2) of the Excise Act where trial conclusion is delayed
The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties
Source reference: para. 7The Court imposed specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must attend all court dates personally (unless exempted), and must appear specifically for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS
Source reference: para. 7Failure to comply would result in proceedings under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS
Source reference: para. 7Original Court PDF
NAND KUMAR KAMARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in