Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of Regular Bail for Offence Under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act Lacking Criminal Antecedents.

NAND KUMAR KAMAR vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 24, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant was arrested on 13.02.2026 in connection with Crime No. 75/2026 at Police Station Mahasamund

Source reference: para. 2, 3

Following an informant's tip, police conducted a raid and seized 24 bulk liters of country-made liquor from the applicant's possession

Source reference: para. 2

The applicant was charged under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant approached the High Court seeking regular bail, contending he was falsely implicated and had no criminal history

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed the bail, citing the quantity of liquor seized

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, considering the nature of the offense and the period of incarceration

Source reference: para. 1, 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant bail

Source reference: para. 1

Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, noting the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years

Source reference: para. 3

procedural requirements for bail conditions under Sections 269 (non-attendance), 84 (proclamation for person absconding), 209 (failure to appear), and 351 (recording of statement) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and BNSS

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court balanced the gravity of the allegations against the applicant's personal circumstances.

Source reference: no citation

It noted that the quantity seized was 24 bulk liters and that the charge-sheet had already been filed, reducing the risk of tampering with the investigation

Source reference: para. 4, 6

Significant weight was given to the fact that the applicant had no prior criminal record and had been in custody since 13.02.2026

Source reference: para. 6

Given that the maximum sentence for the offense is three years and the trial was expected to take considerable time, the Court determined that continued pretrial detention was not necessary, provided strict conditions were imposed to ensure the applicant's participation in the trial

Source reference: para. 3, 6, 7
05

Holding

the absence of criminal antecedents and the filing of the charge-sheet merit the grant of bail in matters involving Section 34(2) of the Excise Act where trial conclusion is delayed

The High Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of the applicant on a personal bond with two sureties

Source reference: para. 7

The Court imposed specific conditions: the applicant must not seek unnecessary adjournments, must attend all court dates personally (unless exempted), and must appear specifically for framing of charges and recording of statements under Section 351 BNSS

Source reference: para. 7

Failure to comply would result in proceedings under Sections 209 and 269 of the BNS

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

NAND KUMAR KAMARvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 24, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment