Chhattisgarh High Court

Grant of regular bail for possession of mahua liquor despite three criminal antecedents.

RAMDHARI PARDHI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High CourtJUDGMENT: April 27, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Ramdhari Pardhi, was arrested on January 19, 2026, by the Pulgaon Police for being in possession of 07 bulk liters of country-made Mahua liquor following a raid.

Source reference: para. 2

He was charged under Sections 34(2) and 49(A)(1) of the C.G. Excise Act in Crime No. 77/2026.

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant moved his First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), arguing false implication and noting that although he has three criminal antecedents, two have been disposed of and one remains pending.

Source reference: para. 3

The State opposed the bail on the grounds that the applicant is a habitual offender with a pending excise case.

Source reference: para. 4
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, considering the quantity of liquor seized and his criminal history.

Source reference: para. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, which governs the High Court’s power to grant bail (formerly Section 439 of the CrPC).

Source reference: para. 1

The court also considered Sections 34(2) and 49(A)(1) of the C.G. Excise Act regarding the illegal possession and sale of liquor.

Source reference: para. 1, 2

Procedural compliance and the consequences of bond forfeiture were governed by Sections 84 (proclamation for person absconding), 209 (failure to appear), 269 (non-attendance), and 351 (recording of statements) of the BNSS.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court weighed the nature and gravity of the allegations against the duration of the applicant's incarceration since January 19, 2026.

Source reference: para. 6

While acknowledging the State’s concern regarding the applicant’s three criminal antecedents, the Court noted that two of these cases had already been disposed of, leaving only one pending excise matter.

Source reference: para. 6

Given that the charge-sheet had already been filed and the trial was expected to take considerable time to conclude, the Court found that continued detention was not warranted.

Source reference: para. 6

To mitigate the risk of recidivism or abscondence, the Court imposed stringent conditions, including personal bonds, sureties, and mandatory presence during critical trial stages.

Source reference: para. 7
05

Holding

The holding clarified that the applicant must not seek adjournments during witness testimony and must personally appear for the framing of charges and recording of his statement under Section 351 of the BNSS.

The Court allowed the bail application and ordered the release of Ramdhari Pardhi on a personal bond with two sureties.

Source reference: para. 7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

RAMDHARI PARDHIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · April 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment