GSTAT - ['Lucknow']Tax LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

GST Tribunal Refuses MSTC’s ₹14,182 Appeal Under Section 112(2)’s ₹50,000 Threshold, Leaving Tax Order Undisturbed

M/S METAL SCRAP TRADE CORPORATION LTDv.SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow

GST Tribunal Refuses MSTC’s ₹14,182 Appeal Under Section 112(2)’s ₹50,000 Threshold, Leaving Tax Order Undisturbed. M/S METAL SCRAP TRADE CORPORATION LTD vs SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow. GSTAT - ['Lucknow']. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal could refuse to admit the appeal under Section 112(2) where the tax/input tax credit involved was below Rs. 50,000

The court held

The Tribunal refused admission of the appeal under Section 112(2).

It also directed

As a result, the Order-in-Appeal dated 23 February 2026 remained undisturbed, and the appeal was disposed of without a determination on the merits.

01Facts

M/s Metal Scrap Trade Corporation Ltd. appealed under Section 112(1) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017, against an Order-in-Appeal dated 23 February 2026.

¶ 1.1–1.6

The Tribunal recorded that the tax/input tax credit involved was Rs. 14,182.

¶ 1.1–1.6

The dispute also concerned penalties of Rs. 40,000 in total.

The Tribunal considered whether to admit the appeal under Section 112(2), and stated that it did not examine the substantive grounds on their merits.

¶ 1.1–1.6

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal could refuse to admit the appeal under Section 112(2) where the tax/input tax credit involved was below Rs. 50,000

¶ 1.2–1.5

ii.Whether the Tribunal’s order determined the substantive grounds of appeal on their merits

¶ 1.6

03Law Applied

Section 112(2) of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 empowers the Appellate Tribunal, in its discretion, to refuse admission of an appeal where the tax or input tax credit involved, the difference in tax or input tax credit involved, or the fine, fee, or penalty determined by the impugned order does not exceed Rs. 50,000.

¶ 1.3–1.4

No precedent was cited.

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 112

Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 Section 112

04Reasoning

The Tribunal treated the tax/input tax credit amount of Rs. 14,182 as below the statutory threshold and exercised its discretion to refuse admission.

¶ 1.2, 1.5

It confined its decision to the threshold question and expressly left the appellant’s grounds and substantive issues unexamined.

¶ 1.2, 1.5–1.6

05Holding

The Tribunal refused admission of the appeal under Section 112(2).

¶ 1.7

As a result, the Order-in-Appeal dated 23 February 2026 remained undisturbed, and the appeal was disposed of without a determination on the merits.

¶ 1.7
GSTAT - ['Lucknow']

Original Court PDF

M/S METAL SCRAP TRADE CORPORATION LTDvsSANJAY KUMAR SINGH, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow

GSTAT - ['Lucknow'] · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment