GSTAT - ['Lucknow']Tax LawAdministrative and Public Law

GSTAT Upholds Section 50(3) Interest After R.S. Traders Paid GSTR-3B/2A Difference After Due Date

R.S. TRADERSv.COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow

GSTAT Upholds Section 50(3) Interest After R.S. Traders Paid GSTR-3B/2A Difference After Due Date. R.S. TRADERS vs COMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow. GSTAT - ['Lucknow']. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the interest under Section 50(3), arising from the difference between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and the subsequent deposit, was properly upheld.

The court held

The Tribunal dismissed the challenge in effect and confirmed the order-in-appeal dated 28 March 2026, thereby upholding interest under Section 50(3).

It also directed

The order was not a remand, and the demand summary recorded no quantified tax, interest, penalty, fee, or other amount.

01Facts

The appellant challenged a demand order dated 28 March 2026, upheld by the Additional Commissioner Grade-II (Appeal-IV), State Tax, Kanpur.

The dispute concerned interest under Section 50(3) in connection with a difference between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and an amount deposited after the due date without payment of interest.

The Tribunal heard the matter on 5 November 2026. No one appeared for the appellant; the respondent was represented by a Deputy Commissioner, SGST.

02Issues

i.Whether the interest under Section 50(3), arising from the difference between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A and the subsequent deposit, was properly upheld.

ii.Whether the order-in-appeal confirming that interest should be sustained.

03Law Applied

The Tribunal identified Section 50(3) of the Act as the basis for the interest at issue and confirmed the order-in-appeal upholding interest under that provision.

The available judgment text does not set out the statutory wording, explain the applicable test, or cite any precedent.

Provisions in the judgment · 1

the Act (alias, unresolved) Section 50

04Reasoning

The Tribunal confirmed the order-in-appeal, which had upheld interest under Section 50(3) in relation to the stated GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A difference and later deposit.

The available text does not provide the Tribunal’s reasoning or explain how it assessed the underlying facts against Section 50(3).

05Holding

The Tribunal dismissed the challenge in effect and confirmed the order-in-appeal dated 28 March 2026, thereby upholding interest under Section 50(3).

The order was not a remand, and the demand summary recorded no quantified tax, interest, penalty, fee, or other amount.

GSTAT - ['Lucknow']

Original Court PDF

R.S. TRADERSvsCOMMISSIONER STATE GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DEPARTMENT, Shri Prakash Yadav Joint Commissioner(IT) State Tax Headquarters Lucknow

GSTAT - ['Lucknow'] · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment