Gujarat High CourtAdministrative and Public LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Gujarat HC Orders Release Of JCB Seized For Alleged Sand Transport Without Permit, On 1.5-Times-Value Bond With Transfer Barred Until Trial Ends

BIJALBHAI HARJIBHAI KHASIYAv.ROYALTY INSPECTOR

Gujarat HC Orders Release Of JCB Seized For Alleged Sand Transport Without Permit, On 1.5-Times-Value Bond With Transfer Barred Until Trial Ends. BIJALBHAI HARJIBHAI KHASIYA vs ROYALTY INSPECTOR. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the High Court could direct interim release of the seized JCB despite the confiscation provisions under the Mines and Minerals Act

The court held

The petition was allowed and the JCB was ordered to be released on the stated conditions; the order further provided for confiscation of the vehicle in the event of a subsequent offence

It also directed

Before release, the police were directed to photograph the vehicle from all sides and prepare a panchanama, both to form part of the charge-sheet papers

A copy of the order was to be sent to the concerned RTO to record the restraint on transfer pending trial, subject to any order of the Trial Court permitting transfer

The Rule was made absolute

01Facts

The petitioner sought release of a JCB bearing registration No. GJ-04-CF-2020, seized by the Royalty Inspector in connection with alleged offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Gujarat Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017

p. 1

The prosecution alleged that the vehicle was carrying sand without a pass or permit when intercepted

p. 2

The petitioner invoked Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking release of the vehicle

p. 1

The State opposed release by reference to the Act’s confiscation provisions, but accepted that the High Court could order release under Article 226

p. 2

02Issues

i.1. Whether the High Court could direct interim release of the seized JCB despite the confiscation provisions under the Mines and Minerals Act

pp. 1–2

ii.2. Whether the vehicle should be released subject to conditions securing its production and preservation pending trial

pp. 2–4

03Law Applied

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution confer powers the Court may exercise to order release of seized property; Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was also invoked by the petitioner

p. 1

The Court relied on Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat, AIR 2003 SC 638, which observed that seized vehicles should not be left unattended to deteriorate and may be handed over on appropriate bonds, guarantees and security, with production secured if required by the Court

p. 3

It also referred to Musa Khan Jat v. State of Gujarat and Jhala Ghanshyamsingh Mobatsingh v. State of Gujarat, which concerned release of vehicles under Articles 226 and 227

p. 2

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482

04Reasoning

The Court accepted that the vehicle was seized following an allegation that it was carrying sand without a permit, and noted the State’s reliance on confiscation provisions

pp. 1–2

However, the State did not dispute the Court’s power to order release under Article 226, and the Court relied on the principle that retaining seized vehicles for long periods may cause them to deteriorate

pp. 2–3

It therefore ordered release subject to a solvent surety and personal bond for 1.5 times the vehicle’s value, an undertaking not to transfer it pending trial, and an obligation to produce it when directed

p. 3

05Holding

The petition was allowed and the JCB was ordered to be released on the stated conditions; the order further provided for confiscation of the vehicle in the event of a subsequent offence

p. 3

Before release, the police were directed to photograph the vehicle from all sides and prepare a panchanama, both to form part of the charge-sheet papers

p. 4

A copy of the order was to be sent to the concerned RTO to record the restraint on transfer pending trial, subject to any order of the Trial Court permitting transfer

p. 4

The Rule was made absolute

p. 4
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

BIJALBHAI HARJIBHAI KHASIYAvsROYALTY INSPECTOR

Gujarat High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment