Facts
A search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was conducted at the petitioner’s residence on 11 April 2017. During the search, silver weighing approximately 39 kg was found in a cupboard; the petitioner was questioned about its source and stated that 15 kg belonged to his wife.
Source reference: p. 2, paras. 3–3.1For A.Y. 2018–19, the petitioner filed a return declaring total income of Rs. 1,92,72,870; the return was not selected for scrutiny.
Source reference: p. 2, para. 3.2The Assessing Officer subsequently issued a notice under Section 148A(b), passed an order under Section 148A(d), and issued a notice under Section 148. The petitioner challenged those actions, contending that reassessment concerning the 2017 search could not be initiated under Sections 147/148.
Source reference: pp. 2–3, paras. 3.2, 4Issues
Whether, in relation to material found during a search conducted before 1 April 2021, the Assessing Officer could initiate reassessment under Sections 148A and 148, rather than proceeding under the applicable search-assessment provisions.
Source reference: pp. 3, 5, paras. 4, 6.1–7Whether the impugned notice under Section 148A(b), order under Section 148A(d), and notice under Section 148 were liable to be quashed as without jurisdiction.
Source reference: p. 6, para. 8Law Applied
Section 149 of the Income Tax Act, as set out in the judgment, limits the time for issuing a notice under Section 148 and contains provisions addressing cases involving searches and the applicability of Sections 153A/153C.
Source reference: pp. 4–5, para. 6Relying on Paras Chandreshbhai Koticha v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(2)(2), the Court applied the principle that where reassessment is based on incriminating material found during a search and the statutory conditions for search assessment apply, the Assessing Officer must proceed under Section 153A or Section 153C, as applicable, and cannot use Sections 147/148 on that same material; reassessment under Sections 147/148 may be considered on the basis of independent material from other sources.
Source reference: p. 5, para. 7Reasoning
The search in this case took place on 11 April 2017, before 1 April 2021, and the reassessment action was based on material arising from that search.
Source reference: pp. 2, 5, paras. 3, 6.1Applying Section 149 and the rule stated in Paras Chandreshbhai Koticha, the Court held that the Assessing Officer could not assume jurisdiction under Sections 148A and 148 on the basis of the search material; the applicable course was under the search-assessment provisions.
Source reference: pp. 5–6, paras. 6.1–7Holding
The Court allowed the petition and quashed the notice dated 14 March 2022 under Section 148A(b), the order dated 7 April 2022 under Section 148A(d), and the notice dated 7 April 2022 under Section 148.
The Rule was made absolute, with no order as to costs.
Source reference: p. 6, para. 8Acts & Sections Cited
8 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Linked provisions open on LawLens.
Income Tax Act, 19618
Original Court PDF
DEVENDRA ANUBHAI SHAHvsASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 4(1)(1), AHMEDABAD
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
