01Facts
The applicant, the opponent’s wife, resided at Surat and sought transfer of Family Suit No. 23 of 2026, instituted by the opponent before the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat.
¶ 3 · pp. 2–3She also had an application under Section 144 of the BNSS pending before the Family Court, Surat, and responsibility for two minor children.
¶ 3 · pp. 2–3The opponent was served but did not appear, despite being given a further opportunity to contest the transfer application.
¶ 1–3 · pp. 1–202Issues
i.1. Whether Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 should be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat, in light of the applicant’s circumstances and the uncontroverted averments.
¶ 3–6 · pp. 2–3ii.2. Whether the opponent should be permitted to request participation in the transferred proceedings by video conference or online mode.
¶ 7 · p. 303Law Applied
The Court relied on Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay, AIR 2002 SC 396, and N.C.V. Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1199; 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 627, as authorities relevant to the transfer of matrimonial proceedings.
¶ 5 · p. 3Section 144 of the BNSS was mentioned as the basis of the applicant’s pending maintenance application, not as the basis for transfer.
¶ 3 · p. 2Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144
04Reasoning
The Court considered the applicant’s residence at Surat, her responsibility for two minor children, and the pending maintenance application there.
¶ 3 · pp. 2–3The opponent’s failure to appear left those averments uncontroverted, and the Court had previously found that the application warranted consideration.
¶ 3–4 · pp. 2–3Applying the cited Supreme Court authorities, the Court accepted the applicant’s transfer request.
¶ 5–7 · pp. 3–4It also provided that the opponent could seek to participate remotely, subject to the concerned court’s assessment of whether physical presence was required.
¶ 5–7 · pp. 3–405Holding
The application was allowed, and Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 was directed to be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat.
¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4The opponent may request video-conference or online participation, which the receiving court may consider unless physical attendance is required.
¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4The Rule was made absolute.
¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4Original Court PDF
HINABEN W/O KAPILBHAI PATEL D/O SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI PATELvsKAPILBHAI BALLUBHAI PATEL
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
