Gujarat High CourtFamily LawCivil Procedure and Evidence

Gujarat HC Transfers Husband’s Valsad Family Suit To Surat, Where Wife Lives And Seeks Maintenance While Caring For Two Minor Children

HINABEN W/O KAPILBHAI PATEL D/O SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI PATELv.KAPILBHAI BALLUBHAI PATEL

Gujarat HC Transfers Husband’s Valsad Family Suit To Surat, Where Wife Lives And Seeks Maintenance While Caring For Two Minor Children. HINABEN W/O KAPILBHAI PATEL D/O SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI PATEL vs KAPILBHAI BALLUBHAI PATEL. Gujarat High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 should be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat, in light of the applicant’s circumstances and the uncontroverted averments.

The court held

The application was allowed, and Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 was directed to be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat.

It also directed

The opponent may request video-conference or online participation, which the receiving court may consider unless physical attendance is required.

The Rule was made absolute.

01Facts

The applicant, the opponent’s wife, resided at Surat and sought transfer of Family Suit No. 23 of 2026, instituted by the opponent before the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat.

¶ 3 · pp. 2–3

She also had an application under Section 144 of the BNSS pending before the Family Court, Surat, and responsibility for two minor children.

¶ 3 · pp. 2–3

The opponent was served but did not appear, despite being given a further opportunity to contest the transfer application.

¶ 1–3 · pp. 1–2

02Issues

i.1. Whether Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 should be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat, in light of the applicant’s circumstances and the uncontroverted averments.

¶ 3–6 · pp. 2–3

ii.2. Whether the opponent should be permitted to request participation in the transferred proceedings by video conference or online mode.

¶ 7 · p. 3

03Law Applied

The Court relied on Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay, AIR 2002 SC 396, and N.C.V. Aishwarya v. A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1199; 2022 LiveLaw (SC) 627, as authorities relevant to the transfer of matrimonial proceedings.

¶ 5 · p. 3

Section 144 of the BNSS was mentioned as the basis of the applicant’s pending maintenance application, not as the basis for transfer.

¶ 3 · p. 2

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 144

04Reasoning

The Court considered the applicant’s residence at Surat, her responsibility for two minor children, and the pending maintenance application there.

¶ 3 · pp. 2–3

The opponent’s failure to appear left those averments uncontroverted, and the Court had previously found that the application warranted consideration.

¶ 3–4 · pp. 2–3

Applying the cited Supreme Court authorities, the Court accepted the applicant’s transfer request.

¶ 5–7 · pp. 3–4

It also provided that the opponent could seek to participate remotely, subject to the concerned court’s assessment of whether physical presence was required.

¶ 5–7 · pp. 3–4

05Holding

The application was allowed, and Family Suit No. 23 of 2026 was directed to be transferred from the Family Court, Valsad, to the Family Court, Surat.

¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4

The opponent may request video-conference or online participation, which the receiving court may consider unless physical attendance is required.

¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4

The Rule was made absolute.

¶ 6–8 · pp. 3–4
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

HINABEN W/O KAPILBHAI PATEL D/O SHANKARBHAI MAGANBHAI PATELvsKAPILBHAI BALLUBHAI PATEL

Gujarat High Court · November 06, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment