Facts
The applicant sought first bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, concerning Crime No. 51/2025
Source reference: para 1On 11.04.2025, police seized 262.258 kg of ganja from a Fortuner car, but the driver escaped
Source reference: para 2On 02.08.2025, based on Cyber Cell information regarding a different vehicle and mobile number, the applicant was intercepted
Source reference: para 2Although no contraband was found on his person or in the intercepted vehicle, he was implicated via a memorandum statement related to the initial seizure
Source reference: para 2The applicant contended he was falsely implicated due to a minor altercation with police and had been in custody since 20.08.2025
Source reference: para 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, despite the recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband and the existence of a criminal antecedent
Source reference: para 4, 6Law Applied
Section 20(B) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act regarding the possession and trafficking of ganja
Source reference: para 1Deepak Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Another (2022) 8 SCC 559, which mandates that bail may be denied or cancelled if the accused has previous criminal antecedents and is considered a habitual offender
Source reference: para 6Reasoning
The Court weighed the applicant’s defense—that no contraband was recovered from his immediate possession and that he was implicated solely on a memorandum statement—against the gravity of the offense
Source reference: para 3, 6The Court noted that the quantity seized (262.258 kg) significantly exceeds the commercial threshold
Source reference: para 6Crucially, the prosecution highlighted that the applicant had a prior criminal record under the NDPS Act in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, classifying him as a habitual offender
Source reference: para 4, 6The Court observed that the applicant had misused bail granted in previous proceedings
Source reference: para 6Applying the Deepak Yadav precedent, the Court reasoned that the combination of a commercial quantity of narcotics and the applicant's criminal history outweighed the arguments for his release
Source reference: para 6Holding
The Court answered the issue in the negative, holding that it is not a fit case to enlarge the applicant on regular bail due to the commercial quantity of the contraband and his status as a habitual offender
The bail application was rejected
Source reference: para 6The trial court was directed to expedite the trial and a certified copy of the order was sent for compliance
Source reference: para 7, 8Acts & Sections Cited
2 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 19851
Original Court PDF
OMPRAKASH BHADUvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
