Facts
The applicant sought anticipatory bail regarding Crime No. 84/2026 registered at Police Station Basna, Mahasamund.
Source reference: p. 1-2On February 25, 2026, police intercepted two trucks transporting sponge iron under allegedly irregular tax invoices and without proper weighment slips or E-way Bill numbers.
Source reference: para. 2The applicant was charged under Sections 316(4), 317(2), 318(4), 336(2), 338, 340, and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.
Source reference: para. 1The applicant contended he was not named in the First Information Report (FIR) and sought parity with a co-accused already granted bail.
Source reference: para. 3Issues
1. Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, based on the principle of parity and the likelihood of a prolonged trial.
Source reference: para. 5Law Applied
Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which governs the High Court's power to grant direction for bail to a person apprehending arrest.
Source reference: para. 1Principle of parity, noting that a similarly situated co-accused, Abdul Salim, had been granted anticipatory bail by the same Court in M.Cr.C(A) No. 619/2026 on April 24, 2026.
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The Court analyzed the facts and circumstances of the case, specifically noting that the applicant’s name was absent from the initial FIR.
Source reference: para. 3The Court observed that the primary allegations involved procedural irregularities in transport documentation (tax invoices and weighment slips) rather than violent crime.
Source reference: para. 2The Court applied the doctrine of parity, finding the applicant's situation comparable to co-accused Abdul Salim, who had already been granted relief.
Source reference: para. 5The Court reasoned that since the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time to conclude, custodial interrogation or detention was not necessitated at this stage.
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The Court answered the issue in the affirmative and allowed the anticipatory bail application.
The Court held that in the event of arrest, the applicant shall be released upon executing a personal bond with one surety, subject to several conditions including non-influence of witnesses, appearance on trial dates, and Aadhaar verification.
Source reference: para. 6Original Court PDF
AMIT SHARMAvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in