Facts
The court dealt with two petitions seeking the quashing of cross-FIRs (No. 354/2012 and No. 355/2012) registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj South on November 1, 2012
Source reference: p.2FIR 354/2012 involved allegations of criminal trespass and assault under Sections 452/323/34 IPC against five accused persons
Source reference: para 4FIR 355/2012 involved allegations of assault and wrongful restraint under Sections 323/325/341/34 IPC against two accused persons
Source reference: para 5Both cases arose from a scuffle between relatives and were at the stage of prosecution evidence
Source reference: para 4-5On May 14, 2026, the parties entered into a written Compromise Deed, stating they had settled the dispute amicably out of their own free will
Source reference: para 6-8Issues
1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers to quash criminal proceedings in cross-FIRs involving non-compoundable offences based on a private settlement between related parties
Source reference: para 2, 92. Whether continuing the criminal proceedings would serve any useful purpose given the amicable settlement
Source reference: para 9Law Applied
Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023
Source reference: p.3, para 10The court may quash criminal proceedings where the dispute is primarily private in nature, does not involve public interest, and where a settlement between the parties makes the possibility of conviction remote
Source reference: para 9, 11Reasoning
The court observed that the parties were related to each other and had voluntarily resolved their long-standing disputes, as evidenced by the Compromise Deed and their personal statements before the court
Source reference: para 3, 8The Judge reasoned that because the dispute was "primarily private in nature" and lacked any "public interest" implications, prolonging the trial would be a futile exercise
Source reference: para 9The court noted that since the complainants and victims no longer wished to press charges, the ends of justice would be better served by quashing the FIRs rather than continuing with the prosecution evidence
Source reference: para 9-10Holding
The court answered the issues in the affirmative, holding that it was appropriate to exercise inherent powers to secure the ends of justice.
Both FIR No. 354/2012 and FIR No. 355/2012, along with all consequential proceedings, were quashed
Source reference: para 11The court directed the parties to submit the original Compromise Deed and affidavits to the Trial Court within two weeks and disposed of all pending applications
Source reference: para 12-14Original Court PDF
Sajjan Kumar And OrsvsState Nct Of Delhi And Ors.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in