Delhi High Court
Criminal Procedure and EvidenceFamily Law

High Courts may quash non-compoundable matrimonial proceedings after a genuine settlement between the parties.

Premchand vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High CourtJUDGMENT: September 30, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
High Courts may quash non-compoundable matrimonial proceedings after a genuine settlement between the parties.. Premchand vs State Nct Of Delhi & Anr.. Delhi High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner and respondent no. 2 married in 2013 and have one child.

Source reference: no citation

After living separately from February 2015, respondent no. 2’s complaint led to registration of FIR No. 0189/2016 under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC

Source reference: p. 2

The parties later reached a mediation settlement, agreed to mutual-consent divorce and settled custody and visitation arrangements; they subsequently obtained a divorce decree.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

Respondent no. 2 confirmed in Court that the disputes were settled and that she did not wish to pursue the FIR.

Source reference: p. 3

The petitioner sought quashing of the FIR and consequential proceedings.

Source reference: no citation
02

Issues

1. Whether the High Court could quash the FIR and consequential proceedings, including for the non-compoundable offence under Section 498A IPC, in view of the parties’ settlement.

Source reference: pp. 1, 3–4

2. Whether the settlement was sufficient to warrant quashing in the circumstances of this matrimonial dispute.

Source reference: pp. 3–4
03

Law Applied

Section 528 BNSS, corresponding to Section 482 CrPC, preserves the High Court’s inherent power to quash criminal proceedings to secure the ends of justice.

Source reference: p. 3

Although Section 498A IPC is non-compoundable, non-compoundability does not bar quashing where the dispute is matrimonial, the parties have amicably and voluntarily settled, and quashing would not adversely affect an overriding public interest.

Source reference: p. 3

Relying on Jitendra Raghuvanshi v. Babita Raghuvanshi, (2013) 4 SCC 58, the Court reiterated that the High Court may quash proceedings in matrimonial disputes to give effect to genuine settlements, notwithstanding the non-compoundable nature of the offences.

Source reference: pp. 3–4
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the parties had resolved their disputes through mediation, obtained a mutual-consent divorce, and confirmed the settlement and their request for quashing before the Court.

Source reference: pp. 2–3

In light of the settled matrimonial dispute and respondent no. 2’s stated wish not to pursue the matter, the Court applied its inherent power under Section 528 BNSS despite Section 498A being non-compoundable.

Source reference: pp. 3–4
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 0189/2016, registered under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC, together with all consequential proceedings.

The pending application was also disposed of.

Source reference: p. 4
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 3 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19732

Indian Penal Code, 18602

Delhi High Court

Original Court PDF

PremchandvsState Nct Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · September 30, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment