Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Husband Accused After Wife’s Suicide Gets Bail as Chhattisgarh HC Finds No Specific Act of Abetment Prima Facie Disclosed

DURYODHAN SAHARE @ ABHAY SAHAREv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Husband Accused After Wife’s Suicide Gets Bail as Chhattisgarh HC Finds No Specific Act of Abetment Prima Facie Disclosed. DURYODHAN SAHARE @ ABHAY SAHARE vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances of the case

The court held

The Court allowed the bail application

It also directed

ordered the applicant’s release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, subject to conditions concerning adjournments, court appearances, and attendance at specified trial proceedings

01Facts

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, following his wife’s suicide by hanging

¶ 1

The prosecution alleged that disputes arose from the applicant’s relationship with another woman and that a quarrel between the spouses occurred shortly before the suicide; a suicide note was produced during the investigation

¶ 2

The applicant argued that the note disclosed no abetment, the charge-sheet had been filed, he had no criminal antecedents, and he had been in custody since 18 August 2026

¶ 3

The State opposed bail, relying on the alleged frequent quarrels and the allegations in the note

¶ 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the applicant should be granted regular bail under Section 483 of the BNSS, having regard to the allegations and the circumstances of the case

¶ 1, 5–6

ii.2. Whether the material prima facie disclosed abetment of suicide within the meaning of Section 45 of the BNS

¶ 6

03Law Applied

Section 483 of the BNSS empowers the Court to grant bail

¶ 1

Section 108 of the BNS was the offence alleged against the applicant

¶ 1

In assessing the bail application, the Court considered whether the material prima facie disclosed the ingredients of abetment under Section 45 of the BNS, including a specific act of abetment to commit suicide

¶ 6

No precedent was cited.

Provisions in the judgment · 7 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483Section 84Section 351

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108Section 45Section 269Section 209

04Reasoning

The Court considered the suicide note and the allegations of marital disputes but concluded that no specific act of abetment to suicide was prima facie disclosed, and that the ingredients of Section 45 of the BNS did not appear to be made out

¶ 6

It also weighed the applicant’s lack of criminal antecedents, his custody since 18 August 2026, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the likelihood that trial would take time

¶ 6

On those grounds, it found bail appropriate.

¶ 6

05Holding

The Court allowed the bail application

¶ 6–7

ordered the applicant’s release on a personal bond of ₹50,000 with one surety for the like sum, subject to conditions concerning adjournments, court appearances, and attendance at specified trial proceedings

¶ 6–7
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

DURYODHAN SAHARE @ ABHAY SAHAREvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 26, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment