CAT - ['Delhi']

Immunity from transfer for elected association office bearers must be granted regardless of long tenure or post-transfer notification.

SUNIL KUMAR GUPTA vs BSNL

CAT - ['Delhi']JUDGMENT: April 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, an Assistant General Manager (AGM) at BSNL Corporate Office, was transferred to the Gujarat Circle via an order dated 02.05.2025.

Source reference: para. 1

The applicant is an elected office bearer (Assistant Circle Secretary) of the All India Graduate Engineers & Telecom Officers Association (AIGETOA), having been elected on 22.04.2025.

Source reference: para. 2, 4

Although three other similarly situated officers were granted immunity and had their transfers modified, the respondents rejected the applicant's representation through a speaking order dated 15.09.2025, alleging the applicant sought election merely to evade transfer.

Source reference: para. 4, 6, 12

BSNL justified the transfer based on public interest and manpower rationalization post-VRS scheme.

Source reference: para. 7
02

Issues

1. Whether the applicant is entitled to immunity from transfer as an elected office bearer under the BSNL (Recognition of Executives’ Association) Rules, 2014.

Source reference: para. 3, 10

2. Whether the denial of immunity to the applicant, while granting it to similarly situated officers, constitutes arbitrary and discriminatory action.

Source reference: para. 13, 14
03

Law Applied

Rule 10(A)(4) of the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (Recognition of Executives’ Association) Rules, 2014, which mandates that the concession of immunity from transfer is applicable to specific office bearers (General Secretary, Assistant General Secretary, and Financial Secretary/Treasurer) for the duration of the recognition period.

Source reference: para. 3

Constitutional principle of equality under Article 14, emphasizing that administrative actions must not be arbitrary or discriminatory when dealing with similarly situated employees.

Source reference: para. 13
04

Reasoning

The Tribunal found that while BSNL claimed ignorance of the applicant’s election at the time of the initial transfer order (02.05.2025), they were indisputably aware of his status by the time the speaking order was passed on 15.09.2025.

Source reference: para. 9, 11

The Tribunal rejected the respondents' argument that the applicant’s long tenure justified denying him immunity, noting that long tenure does not override specific statutory/rule-based protections.

Source reference: para. 14

The court observed that BSNL had granted immunity to three other officers (Ankur Jhalani, Sachin Swarnkar, and Gowri Shankar S) under the same REA Rules. The Tribunal held that denying the applicant the same benefit without justifiable grounds was illogical, arbitrary, and a violation of the principle of equality.

Source reference: para. 6, 12, 13
05

Holding

The Tribunal answered both issues in the affirmative. It held that the denial of immunity was contrary to the BSNL REA Rules and legally unsustainable.

The Original Application was allowed; the transfer order dated 02.05.2025 (specific to the applicant) and the speaking order dated 15.09.2025 were quashed and set aside. No costs were ordered.

Source reference: para. 15
CAT - ['Delhi']

Original Court PDF

SUNIL KUMAR GUPTAvsBSNL

CAT - ['Delhi'] · April 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment