01Facts
The petitioner challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 04.06.2021, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.
¶ 2-3The Revenue initially issued the notice under the old regime, relying on the extension provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA).
¶ 4Following the Supreme Court’s decision in *Ashish Agarwal*, the notice was treated as a show-cause notice under the new Section 148A(b), leading to a subsequent order under Section 148A(d) and a fresh notice under Section 148 in July/August 2022.
¶ 4The petitioner contended that for AY 2015-16, the reassessment was time-barred as it fell outside the permissible limits defined by the Supreme Court in subsequent rulings.
¶ 5-602Issues
i.Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 is hit by the limitation period prescribed under Section 149 of the Act.
¶ 603Law Applied
The Court applied Section 149 of the Income Tax Act (as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2021), which governs the time limits for reopening assessments.
¶ 6It relied heavily on the Supreme Court precedents in *Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal* (2024), which held that for AY 2015-16, the three-year period expired on 31.03.2019 and the six-year period expired on 31.03.2022, effectively excluding such notices from the protective umbrella of TOLA extensions.
¶ 6The Court also followed *Deepak Steel and Power Ltd v. CBDT* (2025), where the Revenue conceded that notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after April 1, 2021, must be dropped.
¶ 7Provisions in the judgment · 5
Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148Section 148ASection 149Section 155
Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 Section 3
04Reasoning
The Court noted that the Revenue had already conceded before the Supreme Court in *Rajeev Bansal* that notices for AY 2015-16 issued after 01.04.2021 are invalid because they do not fall within the completion period prescribed under TOLA.
¶ 6, 7For AY 2015-16, the statutory six-year limit under the old regime would have expired after the TOLA period began, but under the new regime (w.e.f. 01.04.2021), the notice must comply with the new Section 149.
¶ 6Since the impugned notices in this case were finalized in July/August 2022 (after the 31.03.2022 cutoff for the six-year limit) or were originally issued during the interregnum (01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021) without meeting the revised criteria for AY 2015-16, they are legally unsustainable.
¶ 13, 1405Holding
The Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16.
¶ 14-15It held that all reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after 01.04.2021 are invalid as they are time-barred and do not benefit from TOLA relaxations.
¶ 13-14Rule made absolute.
¶ 15Original Court PDF
Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot (R/Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
