Facts
The petitioner challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 04.06.2021, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.
Source reference: para. 2-3The Revenue initially issued the notice under the old regime, relying on the extension provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA).
Source reference: para. 4Following the Supreme Court’s decision in *Ashish Agarwal*, the notice was treated as a show-cause notice under the new Section 148A(b), leading to a subsequent order under Section 148A(d) and a fresh notice under Section 148 in July/August 2022.
Source reference: para. 4The petitioner contended that for AY 2015-16, the reassessment was time-barred as it fell outside the permissible limits defined by the Supreme Court in subsequent rulings.
Source reference: para. 5-6Issues
Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 is hit by the limitation period prescribed under Section 149 of the Act.
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The Court applied Section 149 of the Income Tax Act (as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2021), which governs the time limits for reopening assessments.
Source reference: para. 6It relied heavily on the Supreme Court precedents in *Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal* (2024), which held that for AY 2015-16, the three-year period expired on 31.03.2019 and the six-year period expired on 31.03.2022, effectively excluding such notices from the protective umbrella of TOLA extensions.
Source reference: para. 6The Court also followed *Deepak Steel and Power Ltd v. CBDT* (2025), where the Revenue conceded that notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after April 1, 2021, must be dropped.
Source reference: para. 7Reasoning
The Court noted that the Revenue had already conceded before the Supreme Court in *Rajeev Bansal* that notices for AY 2015-16 issued after 01.04.2021 are invalid because they do not fall within the completion period prescribed under TOLA.
Source reference: para. 6, 7For AY 2015-16, the statutory six-year limit under the old regime would have expired after the TOLA period began, but under the new regime (w.e.f. 01.04.2021), the notice must comply with the new Section 149.
Source reference: para. 6Since the impugned notices in this case were finalized in July/August 2022 (after the 31.03.2022 cutoff for the six-year limit) or were originally issued during the interregnum (01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021) without meeting the revised criteria for AY 2015-16, they are legally unsustainable.
Source reference: para. 13, 14Holding
The Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16.
It held that all reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after 01.04.2021 are invalid as they are time-barred and do not benefit from TOLA relaxations.
Source reference: para. 13-14Rule made absolute.
Source reference: para. 15Original Court PDF
Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot (R/Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in