Gujarat High Court

Income Tax reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued after April 1, 2021, are time-barred and invalid.

Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot (R/Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022)

Gujarat High CourtJUDGMENT: no citation2 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The petitioner challenged a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 04.06.2021, for Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16.

Source reference: para. 2-3

The Revenue initially issued the notice under the old regime, relying on the extension provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA).

Source reference: para. 4

Following the Supreme Court’s decision in *Ashish Agarwal*, the notice was treated as a show-cause notice under the new Section 148A(b), leading to a subsequent order under Section 148A(d) and a fresh notice under Section 148 in July/August 2022.

Source reference: para. 4

The petitioner contended that for AY 2015-16, the reassessment was time-barred as it fell outside the permissible limits defined by the Supreme Court in subsequent rulings.

Source reference: para. 5-6
02

Issues

Whether the notice issued under Section 148 for Assessment Year 2015-16 after 01.04.2021 is hit by the limitation period prescribed under Section 149 of the Act.

Source reference: para. 6
03

Law Applied

The Court applied Section 149 of the Income Tax Act (as amended w.e.f. 01.04.2021), which governs the time limits for reopening assessments.

Source reference: para. 6

It relied heavily on the Supreme Court precedents in *Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal* (2024), which held that for AY 2015-16, the three-year period expired on 31.03.2019 and the six-year period expired on 31.03.2022, effectively excluding such notices from the protective umbrella of TOLA extensions.

Source reference: para. 6

The Court also followed *Deepak Steel and Power Ltd v. CBDT* (2025), where the Revenue conceded that notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after April 1, 2021, must be dropped.

Source reference: para. 7
04

Reasoning

The Court noted that the Revenue had already conceded before the Supreme Court in *Rajeev Bansal* that notices for AY 2015-16 issued after 01.04.2021 are invalid because they do not fall within the completion period prescribed under TOLA.

Source reference: para. 6, 7

For AY 2015-16, the statutory six-year limit under the old regime would have expired after the TOLA period began, but under the new regime (w.e.f. 01.04.2021), the notice must comply with the new Section 149.

Source reference: para. 6

Since the impugned notices in this case were finalized in July/August 2022 (after the 31.03.2022 cutoff for the six-year limit) or were originally issued during the interregnum (01.04.2021 to 30.06.2021) without meeting the revised criteria for AY 2015-16, they are legally unsustainable.

Source reference: para. 13, 14
05

Holding

The Court allowed the petition and quashed the impugned notice issued under Section 148 for AY 2015-16.

It held that all reassessment notices for AY 2015-16 issued on or after 01.04.2021 are invalid as they are time-barred and do not benefit from TOLA relaxations.

Source reference: para. 13-14

Rule made absolute.

Source reference: para. 15
Gujarat High Court

Original Court PDF

Rajesh Mansukhlal Gadoya v. Income Tax Officer Ward 1(2)(1), Rajkot (R/Special Civil Application No. 20541 of 2022)

Gujarat High Court · no citation

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment