Facts
The Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain Respondents 1 to 3 (state and municipal authorities) from allowing Respondent 4 to evict the Petitioner from a property measuring 2430 sq. feet at S.No.21/2, Upilipalayam Village, Coimbatore
Source reference: p. 1The dispute involves the Petitioner’s occupation of land which the authorities characterize as Open Space Reservation (OSR) land subject to eviction for encroachment
Source reference: p. 2-3The matter follows a previous order passed by the High Court in a related proceeding, W.P. No. 5931 of 2026
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether a writ of mandamus seeking an injunction against eviction is maintainable when it involves the adjudication of civil rights
Source reference: p. 2Whether the Petitioner is entitled to procedural due process before being evicted from alleged OSR land
Source reference: p. 2-3Law Applied
The Court primarily applied the principles governing Article 226 of the Constitution of India, specifically the limitation that writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized to grant reliefs in the nature of a civil injunction where private civil rights are contested
Source reference: p. 2It further applied the principle of administrative due process, requiring that enforcement actions for the eviction of encroachers from public or OSR lands must be preceded by a consideration of the occupant's explanations and supporting documents
Source reference: p. 2-3Reasoning
The Court held that the relief sought by the Petitioner was "misconceived," as a writ proceeding is not the appropriate forum for seeking an injunction over civil rights
Source reference: p. 2Referring to its earlier order in W.P. No. 5931 of 2026, the Court reasoned that the Petitioner must be afforded an opportunity to present his case
Source reference: p. 2The Court balanced the municipality's duty to clear encroachments with the Petitioner's right to be heard by directing the Commissioner to consider the Petitioner's explanations and documents before taking a final decision on the enforcement action
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The Court disposed of the writ petition, denying the primary prayer for an injunction but granting the Petitioner liberty to submit explanations and documents to the Commissioner of the Coimbatore Municipal Corporation
The Court directed the Commissioner to consider such submissions and take a final decision before continuing any enforcement action for the eviction of encroachers from the OSR land
Source reference: p. 2-3No costs were awarded
Source reference: p. 3Original Court PDF
K.DURAI RAJvsTHE DIRECTOR OF TOWN and country planning
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in