Facts
The original claimant, Mayank Shrivastava, sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident involving a car (bearing registration no. C.G.-04/DY-8444)
Source reference: p. 1-2A claim petition was filed on 24/12/2014
Source reference: para. 5During the proceedings, the original claimant passed away; however, his death was attributed to cancer rather than the injuries sustained in the accident
Source reference: para. 3, 5The 1st Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Raipur, passed an award on 10/01/2019, granting Rs. 38,000/- as compensation for the injuries
Source reference: para. 1-2The appellants (parents of the deceased) preferred this appeal seeking an enhancement of the compensation, contending that the amount awarded was inadequate
Source reference: para. 1-2Issues
1. Whether the compensation of Rs. 38,000/- awarded by the Claims Tribunal for the injuries sustained by the original claimant was just and reasonable or necessitated enhancement
Source reference: para. 2Law Applied
The Court primarily applied Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which governs the filing of appeals against awards passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunals
Source reference: para. 1The Court also followed the principle of awarding "just compensation" for personal injuries, even in cases where the claimant subsequently dies of causes unrelated to the accident (non-fatal accidents), ensuring that the compensation reflects the gravity of the suffering and medical requirements during the claimant's lifetime
Source reference: para. 5Reasoning
The Court examined the records and considered the rival submissions regarding the nature of the injuries.
Source reference: para. 3-5While the Respondent (Insurance Company) argued that the death was not proximately caused by the accident but by cancer, the Court focused on the adequacy of the compensation for the period the claimant survived post-accident
Source reference: para. 3-5The Court determined that the initial award of Rs. 38,000/- was insufficient given the circumstances of the injuries sustained
Source reference: para. 5Consequently, even though the subsequent death was unrelated to the motor accident, the Court found it appropriate to exercise its discretion to enhance the quantum to a more equitable sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- to meet the ends of justice
Source reference: para. 5Holding
The High Court allowed the appeal and modified the impugned award dated 10/01/2019
The Court held that the claimants are entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 62,000/-, bringing the total award to Rs. 1,00,000/-
Source reference: para. 5Respondent No. 3 (Tata A.I.G. General Insurance Co. Ltd.) was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within 30 days of the order
Source reference: para. 5Furthermore, the Court ordered that the additional amount shall carry interest @ 9% per annum from the date of the claim application (24/12/2014) until realization
Source reference: para. 5All other conditions of the original award remained intact
Source reference: para. 5Original Court PDF
SMT. BHANUPRABHA SHRIVASTAVvsJITENDRA DAS MANIKPURI
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in