Facts
The appellant sustained a fracture to his right leg in a road accident on 9 October 2020 and underwent hospital treatment, including insertion of a rod.
Source reference: para. 6He was admitted on several occasions for approximately 20–21 days and produced medical bills totalling ₹4,42,563.
Source reference: para. 6He did not produce medical documentation establishing permanent disability.
Source reference: para. 6The Claims Tribunal awarded ₹5,13,563.
Source reference: paras. 2–3The claimant appealed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, including compensation for future medical expenses.
Source reference: paras. 2–3Issues
Whether the Tribunal’s award of ₹5,13,563 was inadequate in light of the claimant’s injuries and treatment, warranting enhancement.
Source reference: paras. 3–6Whether an amount should be awarded for future medical treatment and incidental expenses not supported by formal receipts.
Source reference: para. 6Law Applied
The Court exercised appellate jurisdiction under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to consider the claimant’s challenge to the compensation award.
Source reference: para. 2It applied a case-specific approach to reassessing compensation across relevant heads, including medical and incidental expenses; it recognised that hospitalisation and treatment may involve reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for which formal receipts are unavailable, and that future medical expenses may be awarded in light of the circumstances.
Source reference: para. 6Reasoning
The Court accepted the documented medical expenses considered by the Tribunal but found that the claimant’s repeated admissions and treatment justified higher amounts for attendant, transport, special diet, pain and suffering, and loss of income during treatment.
Source reference: paras. 6–7It also considered reasonable incidental expenses likely to have been incurred without receipts and awarded ₹30,000 for future treatment.
Source reference: paras. 6–7Because no medical certificate or other document established permanent disability, the Court’s reassessment was based on the injuries and treatment shown on the record.
Source reference: para. 6Holding
The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹5,13,563 to ₹6,50,000, entitling the appellant to an additional ₹1,36,437.
The additional amount carries interest at 6% per annum from the date the claim application was filed until realization; the remaining terms of the Tribunal’s award remain unchanged.
Source reference: paras. 7–9The Registry was directed to communicate the enhanced amount to the claimant in Hindi Devanagari, with paralegal assistance if required.
Source reference: para. 10Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
SURESH KUMAR YADAVvsPRAMOD KUMAR SINGH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
