Judicial proceeding is deemed initiated only upon submission of charge-sheet or framing of charges under Bihar Pension Rules.

The petitioner, a retired government employee, challenged Memo No. 19285 dated 02.12.2024, which withheld 10% of his pension, full gratuity, and earned leave

Although the petitioner was exonerated in departmental proceedings and a prior prosecution sanction was quashed by the High Court in Cr.W.J.C. No. 2038 of 2024, the State issued a fresh sanction order for prosecution on 25.09.2025 under liberty granted by the Court

The State contended that the existence of this new sanction justified withholding the terminal benefits

However, the petitioner asserted that while an FIR exists and sanction was granted, no charge sheet had been filed in the criminal court to date

1. Whether a judicial proceeding is deemed to have been instituted merely upon the registration of an FIR or the grant of a prosecution sanction for the purpose of withholding pensionary benefits under the Bihar Pension Rules

2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to the release of his withheld pension, gratuity, and earned leave in the absence of a filed charge sheet or framed charges

The court applied Rule 43(b), specifically Explanation (b)(i) of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950, which stipulates that a judicial proceeding is deemed instituted in criminal cases only on the date the complaint is made or the charge sheet is submitted to the Court

The court further relied on Notification No. 9217 dated 25.05.2026 issued by the General Administration Department, Bihar, which clarifies that the pendency of a criminal case against an employee commences from the date of framing of charges by a competent court, not from the date of FIR or sanction

The Court found that the State's reliance on the mere existence of a prosecution sanction was legally untenable

By referring to the statutory definition in Rule 43(b) and the State’s own clarifying resolution dated 25.05.2026, the Court noted that "judicial proceedings" have a specific commencement threshold—the filing of a charge sheet or the framing of charges

Since the petitioner provided uncontested evidence that no charge sheet had been submitted to the competent court, the legal requirement for withholding pensionary benefits was not met

The Court reasoned that the State cannot bypass its own rules and recent clarifications regarding when a proceeding is "pending" to deny an employee their terminal dues

The Court directed Respondent No. 2 to consider and process the petitioner’s claim in light of the resolution dated 25.05.2026 within four weeks. It further ordered that if the petitioner's case is covered by said resolution (i.e., no charge sheet/charges framed), all payments must be released within an additional four weeks. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.