01Facts
The appellants, the deceased’s parents, brother and sister, sought enhancement of compensation awarded for his death in a road accident involving a school bus on 3 April 2018.
pp. 3–5The Tribunal awarded ₹20,22,000, including ₹96,000 for loss of filial consortium, and directed the insurer to pay and recover the amount from the vehicle owner.
pp. 3–5The claimants appealed, contending that consortium had been awarded to only two of them.
pp. 3–5The insurer sought to maintain the pay-and-recover direction and requested notice to the owner before release of the deposited amount.
pp. 3–502Issues
i.1. Whether all four claimants were entitled to compensation for loss of consortium, and whether the award under that head should be enhanced.
pp. 4–5ii.2. Whether the pay-and-recover direction should be maintained and the owner secured before release of the enhanced amount.
pp. 4–5, 6–703Law Applied
The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.
p. 2The Court applied the principle that each of the deceased’s four claimants—his parents, brother and sister—was entitled to ₹40,000 for loss of consortium.
p. 5No precedent or further statutory provision was cited in the judgment for this assessment.
pp. 5–6Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court identified the relationship of each claimant to the deceased and held that all four were entitled to ₹40,000 each for loss of consortium.
p. 5This produced a total entitlement of ₹1,60,000, compared with the Tribunal’s award of ₹96,000, leaving an enhancement of ₹64,000.
p. 5As the claimants sought no enhancement under other heads, the Court confined relief to consortium.
p. 5It also directed that the pay-and-recover arrangement continue and that the Tribunal secure the owner and obtain an undertaking before releasing the enhanced amount.
pp. 4–5, 6–705Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
pp. 6–7The claimants were awarded an additional ₹64,000 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, but without interest for the 562-day delay in filing the appeal.
pp. 6–7The enhanced amount is to be released to the claimants in the ratio 40:40:10:10.
pp. 6–7The insurer may recover the amount from the vehicle owner, and the Tribunal must secure the owner and obtain an undertaking to pay the insurer before release.
pp. 6–7Original Court PDF
VADDE LAKSHMANNAvsM/S. LIBERTY GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
