Karnataka High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Karnataka HC Grants Bail To Man In POCSO Case, Noting No POCSO-Attracting Allegation; His Parents Get Anticipatory Bail

ABHILASHv.STATE BY BELUR POLICE

Karnataka HC Grants Bail To Man In POCSO Case, Noting No POCSO-Attracting Allegation; His Parents Get Anticipatory Bail. ABHILASH vs STATE BY BELUR POLICE. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether accused No. 1 should be enlarged on regular bail in the pending Special Case.

The court held

The Court allowed Crl.P. No. 15403 of 2026 and directed that accused No. 1 be released on bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum, subject to conditions including regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and not leaving the trial court’s jurisdiction without permission.

It also directed

It also allowed Crl.P. No. 15852 of 2026 and directed that accused Nos. 2 and 3 be released in the event of arrest, subject to appearing before the Investigating Officer within 15 days, executing bonds of ₹1,00,000 each with two sureties each, cooperating with the investigation, and complying with the other stated conditions.

01Facts

The petitions arose from Crime No. 191 of 2025 registered by Belur Police following a complaint that the complainant’s 17-year-old daughter had gone missing.

pp. 4–5

Accused No. 1, Abhilash, was arrested and remanded to custody; his application for regular bail was rejected by the Sessions Court.

pp. 4–5

His parents, accused Nos. 2 and 3, sought anticipatory bail after their application was rejected by that court.

pp. 4–5

The victim’s statement before the Magistrate did not allege conduct attracting the charged POCSO offence against accused No. 1 or allegations against accused Nos. 2 and 3.

p. 6

The investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been filed.

p. 6

The victim’s mother, appearing as respondent No. 2, stated that she had no objection to the petitions being allowed.

p. 5

02Issues

i.1. Whether accused No. 1 should be enlarged on regular bail in the pending Special Case.

pp. 4–5, 7

ii.2. Whether accused Nos. 2 and 3 should be granted anticipatory bail in the same case.

p. 5, 7

03Law Applied

The Court considered the bail and anticipatory-bail powers invoked under Sections 483 and 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, respectively, in relation to charges under Sections 137(2), 45 and 64 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

pp. 4, 7–9

The order identifies no precedent or more detailed legal test; it treats the completed investigation, the victim’s statement, and the circumstances of the accused as relevant to granting bail subject to conditions.

pp. 6–7

Provisions in the judgment · 11 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 438Section 439

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482Section 483

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 137Section 45Section 64Section 65Section 3Section 183

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 6

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the victim’s statement did not contain allegations against accused No. 1 attracting the alleged POCSO offence, and did not implicate accused Nos. 2 and 3; it also noted that the investigation was complete and the charge sheet had been filed.

p. 6

Taking those circumstances into account, together with respondent No. 2’s lack of objection, the Court concluded that both regular and anticipatory bail were warranted, subject to conditions.

pp. 5–7

05Holding

The Court allowed Crl.P. No. 15403 of 2026 and directed that accused No. 1 be released on bail on a personal bond of ₹1,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum, subject to conditions including regular court attendance, non-interference with witnesses, and not leaving the trial court’s jurisdiction without permission.

pp. 7–8

It also allowed Crl.P. No. 15852 of 2026 and directed that accused Nos. 2 and 3 be released in the event of arrest, subject to appearing before the Investigating Officer within 15 days, executing bonds of ₹1,00,000 each with two sureties each, cooperating with the investigation, and complying with the other stated conditions.

pp. 8–10
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

ABHILASHvsSTATE BY BELUR POLICE

Karnataka High Court · November 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment