Karnataka High CourtCriminal LawCriminal Procedure and Evidence

Karnataka HC Quashes Case Against Man Accused Of Ganja Use, Citing No FSL Test Of His Urine Sample

HARISH S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR MALIv.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka HC Quashes Case Against Man Accused Of Ganja Use, Citing No FSL Test Of His Urine Sample. HARISH S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR MALI vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the proceedings against the petitioner for the alleged offence under Section 27(b) of the NDPS Act could be quashed where the prosecution relied on a hospital certificate and had not sent a urine sample for FSL examination.

The court held

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in C.C. No. 1461/2026, arising from Hubballi Sub-Urban Police Station Crime No. 75/2026, insofar as they concerned the petitioner, accused No. 1.

It also directed

Pending applications, if any, were disposed of.

01Facts

Police acted on information that persons were consuming ganja near Kumbakona Plot Garden, Hubballi, and apprehended the petitioner and another person.

pp. 2–4

A KIMS Hospital doctor issued a certificate stating that both had tested positive for marijuana consumption. No urine sample was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL).

pp. 2–4

A charge sheet was filed, and proceedings in C.C. No. 1461/2026 were pending against the petitioner for an alleged offence under Section 27(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).

pp. 2–4

The petitioner sought quashing under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure).

pp. 2–4

02Issues

i.1. Whether the proceedings against the petitioner for the alleged offence under Section 27(b) of the NDPS Act could be quashed where the prosecution relied on a hospital certificate and had not sent a urine sample for FSL examination.

pp. 3–5

ii.2. Whether continuation of the proceedings, in the circumstances presented, amounted to an abuse of the process of law.

pp. 5–6

03Law Applied

The Court considered Section 27(b) of the NDPS Act, under which consumption of specified narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances is punishable, and Sections 27-B and 8A, which it set out in its discussion of the statutory scheme.

pp. 4–5

The Court treated the absence of an FSL report confirming the alleged drug consumption as material to whether the prosecution could proceed on the available evidence.

pp. 4–6

It applied its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (Section 528 BNSS) to prevent what it considered an abuse of process.

pp. 4–6

Provisions in the judgment · 2 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Section 482

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the prosecution had not forwarded the petitioner’s urine sample for FSL examination and relied instead on the KIMS Hospital doctor’s certificate stating that the petitioner had tested positive for marijuana consumption.

pp. 4–5

It concluded that, on the material before it, the ingredients of Sections 27-B and 8A were not attracted and that the absence of an FSL report left the prosecution case insufficient to justify continuing the proceedings against the petitioner.

pp. 5–6

It therefore considered the likelihood of conviction remote and continuation of the case an abuse of process.

p. 6

05Holding

The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the proceedings in C.C. No. 1461/2026, arising from Hubballi Sub-Urban Police Station Crime No. 75/2026, insofar as they concerned the petitioner, accused No. 1.

p. 6

Pending applications, if any, were disposed of.

p. 7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

HARISH S/O CHANDRASHEKHAR MALIvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · November 05, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment