Karnataka High CourtCivil LawInsurance Law

Karnataka HC Raises 9-Year-Old’s Crash Compensation To ₹4.45 Lakh, Calculating Future Disability Loss On Minimum Wages

SRI ATEEQ UR REHMANv.TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

Karnataka HC Raises 9-Year-Old’s Crash Compensation To ₹4.45 Lakh, Calculating Future Disability Loss On Minimum Wages. SRI ATEEQ UR REHMAN vs TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the compensation awarded to the minor claimant required enhancement, including compensation for future loss of income due to disability.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The Court enhanced total compensation to ₹4,45,400, an increase of ₹2,51,500 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the petition date until realisation, except on ₹30,000 awarded for future medical expenses.

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within six weeks, and the Tribunal was directed to place it in a fixed deposit in the claimant’s name until he attains majority.

01Facts

The minor claimant, aged nine at the time of the accident, sustained an abrasion to his right earlobe and a fracture of his right femur in a road traffic accident on 26 August 2023.

pp. 5–6

The MACT awarded total compensation of ₹1,93,900 with interest at 6% per annum.

p. 4

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

pp. 2–3

02Issues

i.Whether the compensation awarded to the minor claimant required enhancement, including compensation for future loss of income due to disability.

pp. 5–8

ii.Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for the parent’s loss of income during the claimant’s laid-up period and for future medical expenses.

pp. 6–8

03Law Applied

The Court relied on Hitesh Nagjibhai Patel v. Bababhai Nagjibhai Rabari & Anr., 2025 INSC 1070, for assessing a minor claimant’s future loss of income by applying an income based on minimum wages, the appropriate multiplier, and the percentage of disability.

pp. 5–6

It also referred to Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., 2013 ACJ 2445, which the Tribunal had applied in assessing compensation for the injured minor.

p. 5

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

p. 2

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court accepted the Tribunal’s assessment of whole-body disability at 10%, noting the doctor’s evidence that the fracture had united.

p. 7

Applying the minimum-wage income of ₹16,250 per month, a multiplier of 15 for the claimant’s age, and 10% disability, it calculated future loss of income at ₹2,92,500.

p. 7

It also allowed ₹32,500 for the parent’s loss of income during the claimant’s two-month recovery period, and revised the amounts for pain and suffering, amenities, attendant and conveyance expenses, and future medical expenses.

pp. 6–8

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

pp. 8–9

The Court enhanced total compensation to ₹4,45,400, an increase of ₹2,51,500 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the petition date until realisation, except on ₹30,000 awarded for future medical expenses.

pp. 8–9

The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within six weeks, and the Tribunal was directed to place it in a fixed deposit in the claimant’s name until he attains majority.

p. 10
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI ATEEQ UR REHMANvsTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,

Karnataka High Court · October 28, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment