01Facts
The minor claimant, aged nine at the time of the accident, sustained an abrasion to his right earlobe and a fracture of his right femur in a road traffic accident on 26 August 2023.
pp. 5–6The MACT awarded total compensation of ₹1,93,900 with interest at 6% per annum.
p. 4The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.
pp. 2–302Issues
i.Whether the compensation awarded to the minor claimant required enhancement, including compensation for future loss of income due to disability.
pp. 5–8ii.Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for the parent’s loss of income during the claimant’s laid-up period and for future medical expenses.
pp. 6–803Law Applied
The Court relied on Hitesh Nagjibhai Patel v. Bababhai Nagjibhai Rabari & Anr., 2025 INSC 1070, for assessing a minor claimant’s future loss of income by applying an income based on minimum wages, the appropriate multiplier, and the percentage of disability.
pp. 5–6It also referred to Master Mallikarjun v. Divisional Manager, The National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr., 2013 ACJ 2445, which the Tribunal had applied in assessing compensation for the injured minor.
p. 5The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
p. 2Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173
04Reasoning
The Court accepted the Tribunal’s assessment of whole-body disability at 10%, noting the doctor’s evidence that the fracture had united.
p. 7Applying the minimum-wage income of ₹16,250 per month, a multiplier of 15 for the claimant’s age, and 10% disability, it calculated future loss of income at ₹2,92,500.
p. 7It also allowed ₹32,500 for the parent’s loss of income during the claimant’s two-month recovery period, and revised the amounts for pain and suffering, amenities, attendant and conveyance expenses, and future medical expenses.
pp. 6–805Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
pp. 8–9The Court enhanced total compensation to ₹4,45,400, an increase of ₹2,51,500 over the Tribunal’s award, with interest at 6% per annum from the petition date until realisation, except on ₹30,000 awarded for future medical expenses.
pp. 8–9The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced amount within six weeks, and the Tribunal was directed to place it in a fixed deposit in the claimant’s name until he attains majority.
p. 10Original Court PDF
SRI ATEEQ UR REHMANvsTATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
