Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Karnataka HC Raises Injured Lorry Driver’s Compensation To ₹1.51 Lakh, Citing Two Grievous Injuries And Seven-Day Hospital Stay

BEERAPPA @ RAVIv.MANJU NAIDU

Karnataka HC Raises Injured Lorry Driver’s Compensation To ₹1.51 Lakh, Citing Two Grievous Injuries And Seven-Day Hospital Stay. BEERAPPA @ RAVI vs MANJU NAIDU. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the claimant’s monthly income and compensation for the injuries and resulting losses warranted enhancement.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part, and the Tribunal’s award was modified.

It also directed

The claimant was awarded ₹1,51,000, instead of ₹88,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

As the insurer had already deposited the Tribunal’s award, it was directed to deposit the enhanced amount of ₹63,000, with interest at 6%, within one month.

The claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire amount with accrued interest.

01Facts

The claimant, a lorry driver, sustained injuries in a motor-vehicle accident on 3 May 2012 and sought compensation of ₹5,00,000.

pp. 2–3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal partly allowed the claim, awarding ₹88,000 with interest at 6% per annum.

pp. 2–3

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement, contending that his income and compensation under other heads had been assessed too low

pp. 2–3

02Issues

i.Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of the claimant’s monthly income and compensation for the injuries and resulting losses warranted enhancement.

pp. 3–5

ii.Whether the claimant was entitled to enhanced compensation, and at what rate of interest.

pp. 5–6

03Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

p. 2

In assessing compensation where the claimant has not proved income, the Court used the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s notional-income chart as a reference for the accident year.

p. 4

Compensation was assessed under the heads of pain and suffering, medical expenses, transportation, nourishment and attendant charges, loss of amenities, and loss of income during the laid-up period.

pp. 4–5

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The claimant’s asserted monthly income of ₹10,000 was unsupported by documentary proof. Given the accident occurred in 2012, the Court adopted the KSLSA chart figure of ₹7,000 per month.

p. 4

Considering the recorded injuries, including two grievous injuries, and the period of hospitalisation, the Court increased compensation for pain and suffering, amenities, and transportation, nourishment and attendant charges.

pp. 4–5

It also awarded three months’ lost income at ₹7,000 per month, while confirming the Tribunal’s ₹30,000 award for medical expenses.

pp. 4–5

These reassessments produced total compensation of ₹1,51,000.

p. 5

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part, and the Tribunal’s award was modified.

pp. 6–7

The claimant was awarded ₹1,51,000, instead of ₹88,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realisation.

pp. 6–7

As the insurer had already deposited the Tribunal’s award, it was directed to deposit the enhanced amount of ₹63,000, with interest at 6%, within one month.

pp. 6–7

The claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire amount with accrued interest.

pp. 6–7
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

BEERAPPA @ RAVIvsMANJU NAIDU

Karnataka High Court · September 03, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment