01Facts
The appellant, a pillion rider injured in a collision between two motorcycles on 25 April 2020, claimed compensation for his injuries and resulting disability.
pp. 2–5The Tribunal awarded Rs.4,55,880.50 with 7% interest, but dismissed the claim against the insurer after finding that the rider of the offending motorcycle did not hold a valid and effective driving licence; it directed the vehicle’s owner to pay.
pp. 2–5The claimant appealed, seeking enhanced compensation and a direction that the insurer pay in the first instance.
pp. 2–502Issues
i.1. Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was inadequate and required modification
p. 7ii.2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in fixing liability on the owner, rather than directing the insurer to pay the compensation
p. 703Law Applied
Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, an insurer may raise the defence that the vehicle was driven by a person not duly licensed.
pp. 12–13A breach of the policy condition may absolve the insurer from ultimate liability; however, the court may direct the insurer to satisfy the award and recover the amount from the insured owner (“pay and recover”).
pp. 12–13The Court also relied on *Shamanna v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.*, (2018) 9 SCC 650, and *Singh Ram v. Nirmala*, Civil Appeal No.2103/2018, as authorities cited on liability.
p. 6For assessment of compensation, it applied the multiplier method in *Sarla Verma v. Delhi Transport Corporation*, 2009 ACJ 1298, and used the Karnataka Legal Services Authority guidelines to assess the appellant’s income.
p. 8Provisions in the judgment · 5 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173Section 181Section 149
Indian Penal Code, 1860 Section 279Section 338
04Reasoning
The Court accepted the Tribunal’s monthly income assessment of Rs.13,750 and, applying multiplier 11 to the appellant’s age of 54, assessed whole-body functional disability at 20%, resulting in Rs.3,63,000 for loss of future income.
pp. 8–9It enhanced compensation for pain and suffering, loss of amenities and laid-up-period income, while leaving the awards for medical expenses, future medical expenses, and diet, nourishment, conveyance and attendant charges unchanged; the resulting total was Rs.5,58,981.
pp. 9–10As the evidence established that the rider lacked an effective driving licence, the insurer had a policy-breach defence. Nevertheless, relying on *Rama Bai*, the Court held it appropriate to require the insurer to satisfy the award first and recover from the owner.
pp. 11–1305Holding
The appeal was allowed in part.
pp. 13–14The compensation was enhanced from Rs.4,55,880 to Rs.5,58,981.
pp. 13–14The enhanced compensation was directed to carry interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until payment.
pp. 13–14The owner and insurer were held jointly and severally liable, with the insurer directed to deposit the compensation and accrued interest before the Tribunal within six weeks of receiving the certified judgment and thereafter recover the amount from the owner.
pp. 13–14Original Court PDF
ANJINAPPA S/O HANMANTH GOURIPURADvsSRI. NAGENDRA S/O KOTRESH G
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
