Karnataka High CourtCivil Procedure and EvidenceCommercial and Corporate Law

Karnataka HC Records N D Developers–Mondo Builders Deal: Project Control For One, 1.1 Lakh Sq Ft Of Phase 2 Villas For The Other

M/S N D DEVELOPERS PVT LTDv.M/S. MONDO BUILDERS PVT LTD

Karnataka HC Records N D Developers–Mondo Builders Deal: Project Control For One, 1.1 Lakh Sq Ft Of Phase 2 Villas For The Other. M/S N D DEVELOPERS PVT LTD vs M/S. MONDO BUILDERS PVT LTD. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the parties’ compromise could be accepted and the appeal disposed of in its terms.

The court held

The appeal was dismissed as against respondent No. 2, and the compromise between the appellant and respondent No. 1 was recorded; the appeal was disposed of in accordance with its terms.

It also directed

The Registry was directed to draw up a decree in terms of the compromise.

01Facts

N D Developers Pvt. Ltd. appealed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, against an order dated 25 March 2024 in Commercial A.A. No. 08/2023.

pp. 2–3

During the appeal, the parties jointly informed the Court that they had settled their disputes and presented compromise terms supported by verifying affidavits.

p. 3, 13

The settlement provided, among other matters, for Mondo Builders’ fixed entitlement to 1,10,000 sq. ft. of Phase 2 villa area, N D Developers’ control of the project, allocation and liability arrangements, and closure of related proceedings.

pp. 3–13

The appellant also sought dismissal of the appeal against respondent No. 2, the bank, as that respondent was a formal party.

p. 13

02Issues

i.1. Whether the parties’ compromise could be accepted and the appeal disposed of in its terms.

pp. 3, 13–14

ii.2. Whether the appeal should be dismissed as against respondent No. 2, a formal party.

pp. 13–14

03Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

p. 2

The Court stated that it could record the parties’ compromise where the terms were lawful and not opposed to public policy.

p. 13

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 13

04Reasoning

The Court examined the joint compromise petition and the supporting affidavits, and confirmed that the parties were present and identified by their respective counsel.

p. 13

Being satisfied that the settlement terms were lawful and not contrary to public policy, it recorded the compromise rather than adjudicating the underlying disputes.

pp. 13–14

It also accepted the appellant’s request to dismiss the appeal against respondent No. 2.

pp. 13–14

05Holding

The appeal was dismissed as against respondent No. 2, and the compromise between the appellant and respondent No. 1 was recorded; the appeal was disposed of in accordance with its terms.

p. 14

The Registry was directed to draw up a decree in terms of the compromise.

p. 14
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

M/S N D DEVELOPERS PVT LTDvsM/S. MONDO BUILDERS PVT LTD

Karnataka High Court · October 16, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment