Facts
The Petitioners, legal heirs of Late Mrs. Kailash Kumari, sought regularization of the allotment of Flat No. C-104 in the Mandakini Co-operative Group Housing Society
Source reference: p. 1, para. 2The membership of the deceased was granted in 2004, but she was excluded from the DDA draw of lots, leading the Society to conduct a "self-draw" where she was allotted the flat
Source reference: p. 1-2, para. 3-6Although the RCS initially questioned the validity of self-draws, the Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor upheld such draws in 2011, a position affirmed in Manohar Lal & Anr. Vs. The Registrar
Source reference: p. 2, para. 7-8Following the member’s death on June 19, 2024, the RCS requested specific documents for membership transfer but raised concerns in their reply that a self-draw allotment might be contrary to law
Source reference: p. 2-3, para. 9-11Issues
1. Whether the allotment of Flat No. C-104 via a self-draw process can be regularized and transferred to the legal heirs of the deceased member
Source reference: p. 3, para. 11-122. Whether the Petitioners are entitled to membership transfer upon submission of the documents prescribed by the RCS
Source reference: p. 3, para. 13-14Law Applied
The court relied on the administrative decision of the Hon'ble Lieutenant Governor dated October 17, 2011, which regularized self-draw of lots conducted by societies
Source reference: p. 2, para. 8It further applied the precedent set in Manohar Lal & Anr. Vs. The Registrar, Co-op Group Housing Society and Ors. (W.P.(C) 519/2012), which upheld the validity of such self-draws
Source reference: p. 2, para. 8The procedural requirements for the transfer of membership to legal heirs were governed by the RCS regulatory guidelines, necessitating documents such as the Death Certificate, Surviving Member Certificate, and Society Management Committee resolutions
Source reference: p. 2-3, para. 10Reasoning
The Court noted that the primary hurdle raised by the RCS—the validity of the self-draw—had already been settled by the Lieutenant Governor’s 2011 decision and subsequent judicial precedent
Source reference: p. 2, para. 8Despite the RCS’s lingering objection in its reply regarding the "validity" of the initial membership, the Court observed that the RCS was willing to process the regularization if specific documentation was provided
Source reference: p. 3, para. 11-12The Court reasoned that since the underlying allotment method (self-draw) had been legally recognized, the RCS should proceed with the transfer of membership to the legal heirs (the Petitioners) provided the technical documentation (Death Certificate, Share Certificate, etc.) was in order
Source reference: p. 3, para. 13-14Holding
The Court held that upon submission of the required documents and any necessary clarifications, the RCS must process the regularization of Flat No. C-104 in accordance with law
The Court disposed of the petition by directing the Petitioners and the Society's office bearers to appear before the RCS on June 16, 2026, with the necessary documents. The Registry was directed to serve the order on the Society to ensure compliance
Source reference: p. 3-4, para. 13, 15, 16Original Court PDF
Sangeeta Pabbi And OrsvsRegistrar Of Cooperative Societies And Anr
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in