Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Loss of future income is payable for assessed disability using an age-based multiplier.

SMT. MAMATHA H R vs THE MANAGER

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 22, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Loss of future income is payable for assessed disability using an age-based multiplier.. SMT. MAMATHA H R vs THE MANAGER. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained in an accident on 25 October 2017.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

The Tribunal had awarded ₹1,92,125 with interest at 6% per annum.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

The claimant challenged, among other things, the income adopted, the period allowed for loss of income during treatment, and the failure to award compensation for loss of future income.

Source reference: pp. 3–5

The High Court considered the claimant’s injuries, the medical evidence, and the Tribunal’s assessment.

Source reference: pp. 3–5
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded for loss of income during the laid-up period should be enhanced by reassessing monthly income and the period of incapacity.

Source reference: p. 5

2. Whether the claimant was entitled to compensation for loss of future income on account of disability.

Source reference: pp. 5–6
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against a motor-accident compensation award.

Source reference: p. 2

In assessing compensation, the Court applied the principles of determining reasonable income, the period of loss during recovery, and future loss of income by reference to monthly income, multiplier, and percentage of disability.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

The judgment cites no specific precedent or further statutory provision.

Source reference: pp. 5–6
04

Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal’s 15-day period for loss of income was inadequate and assessed the claimant’s notional monthly income at ₹11,000, rather than ₹10,000, in the absence of documents supporting the claimed earnings of ₹250 per programme.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

It allowed three months for the laid-up period, awarding ₹33,000 under that head.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

Given the claimant’s age and assessed disability of 18%, the Court calculated future loss of income as ₹11,000 × 12 × 14 × 18%, amounting to ₹3,32,640.

Source reference: pp. 5–6

It left the other compensation heads unchanged.

Source reference: p. 6
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court enhanced the compensation by ₹3,55,640, bringing the total award to ₹5,47,765, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until deposit.

Source reference: pp. 6–7

The insurer was directed to deposit the entire compensation within eight weeks, and the Tribunal was directed to release the amount to the claimant upon proper identification.

Source reference: pp. 6–7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT. MAMATHA H RvsTHE MANAGER

Karnataka High Court · September 22, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment