Facts
The claimant sustained multiple fractures and a brachial plexus injury in a road traffic accident on 1 June 2023, allegedly caused by the rash and negligent driving of a tractor.
Source reference: p.3–4He sought compensation before the MACT, Mysuru, which assessed his functional disability at 100% and awarded ₹29,09,761, including ₹17,28,000 for loss of future earnings, ₹1,00,000 for attendant and related expenses, and ₹7,81,761 for medical expenses.
Source reference: p.3–4The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.
Source reference: p.2Issues
Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for loss of future income required enhancement by reassessing the claimant’s notional income.
Source reference: p.4–5Whether the amounts awarded for attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses required enhancement in light of the claimant’s hospitalisation.
Source reference: p.5Law Applied
The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.
Source reference: p.2In assessing compensation, the Court applied the multiplier method to calculate loss of future income, using the claimant’s monthly income, a 10% addition, the multiplier appropriate to his age, and the assessed functional disability.
Source reference: p.4–5It adopted the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s 2023 notional-income figure of ₹16,250 per month and assessed attendant and related expenses at ₹1,000 per day for the period of hospitalisation.
Source reference: p.4–5Reasoning
The Court upheld the Tribunal’s use of multiplier 9, given the claimant’s age of 56 at the time of the accident, and its finding of 100% functional disability.
Source reference: p.4–5It substituted the Tribunal’s monthly income figure of ₹16,000 with the KSLSA figure of ₹16,250 and added 10%, calculating future loss as ₹17,875 × 12 × 9 × 100% = ₹19,30,500.
Source reference: p.4–5It also found that 145 days of hospitalisation justified attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses of ₹1,45,000, rather than ₹1,00,000.
Source reference: p.5The Court otherwise left the awards for pain and suffering, loss of amenities and medical expenses undisturbed.
Source reference: p.5–6Holding
The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹29,09,761 to ₹31,57,261.
It awarded the claimant an additional ₹2,47,500 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, directing the insurer to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks.
Source reference: p.6–7The claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.
Source reference: p.6–7Acts & Sections Cited
1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Motor Vehicles Act, 19881
Original Court PDF
SRI SWAMY GOWDAvsAYYAMMA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
