Karnataka High Court
Transport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Loss of future income must include 10% future prospects when assessing motor accident compensation.

SRI SWAMY GOWDA vs AYYAMMA

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: September 29, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Loss of future income must include 10% future prospects when assessing motor accident compensation.. SRI SWAMY GOWDA vs AYYAMMA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained multiple fractures and a brachial plexus injury in a road traffic accident on 1 June 2023, allegedly caused by the rash and negligent driving of a tractor.

Source reference: p.3–4

He sought compensation before the MACT, Mysuru, which assessed his functional disability at 100% and awarded ₹29,09,761, including ₹17,28,000 for loss of future earnings, ₹1,00,000 for attendant and related expenses, and ₹7,81,761 for medical expenses.

Source reference: p.3–4

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p.2
02

Issues

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal for loss of future income required enhancement by reassessing the claimant’s notional income.

Source reference: p.4–5

Whether the amounts awarded for attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses required enhancement in light of the claimant’s hospitalisation.

Source reference: p.5
03

Law Applied

The appeal was brought under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which provides for an appeal against an award of the Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p.2

In assessing compensation, the Court applied the multiplier method to calculate loss of future income, using the claimant’s monthly income, a 10% addition, the multiplier appropriate to his age, and the assessed functional disability.

Source reference: p.4–5

It adopted the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s 2023 notional-income figure of ₹16,250 per month and assessed attendant and related expenses at ₹1,000 per day for the period of hospitalisation.

Source reference: p.4–5
04

Reasoning

The Court upheld the Tribunal’s use of multiplier 9, given the claimant’s age of 56 at the time of the accident, and its finding of 100% functional disability.

Source reference: p.4–5

It substituted the Tribunal’s monthly income figure of ₹16,000 with the KSLSA figure of ₹16,250 and added 10%, calculating future loss as ₹17,875 × 12 × 9 × 100% = ₹19,30,500.

Source reference: p.4–5

It also found that 145 days of hospitalisation justified attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment expenses of ₹1,45,000, rather than ₹1,00,000.

Source reference: p.5

The Court otherwise left the awards for pain and suffering, loss of amenities and medical expenses undisturbed.

Source reference: p.5–6
05

Holding

The Court partly allowed the appeal and enhanced the total compensation from ₹29,09,761 to ₹31,57,261.

It awarded the claimant an additional ₹2,47,500 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization, directing the insurer to deposit the enhanced amount with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks.

Source reference: p.6–7

The claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: p.6–7
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SRI SWAMY GOWDAvsAYYAMMA

Karnataka High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment