CAT - Delhi

Low interview scores alone insufficient to prove selection arbitrariness.

Nisha v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., O.A. No. 610/2024

CAT - DelhiJUDGMENT: no citation1 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The applicant, Nisha, applied for the post of TGT (Physical & Health Education) under the OBC category pursuant to Advertisement No. 15/2022 issued by the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS).

Source reference: para. 2

She secured 153 marks in the written examination conducted in February 2023, exceeding the cut-off of 100 marks for her category.

Source reference: para. 2.1

The applicant was shortlisted and appeared for an interview on May 27, 2023.

Source reference: para. 2.2

However, her name was not included in the provisional list of selected candidates published on November 28, 2023.

Source reference: para. 2.2

Through an RTI application dated December 19, 2023, the applicant sought information regarding her interview marks.

Source reference: para. 2.3

The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), which conducted the written exam and facilitated the interview process, revealed that the applicant secured 153 marks in the written test and only 8 marks in the interview.

Source reference: para. 4.2
CAT - Delhi

Original Court PDF

Nisha v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Ors., O.A. No. 610/2024

CAT - Delhi · no citation

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment