Karnataka High CourtTransport, Maritime, and Aviation LawCivil Law

Lower-limb disability is assessed at one-third of the limb disability for whole-body compensation.

VENKATESH Bv.JAYASHANKARA

Lower-limb disability is assessed at one-third of the limb disability for whole-body compensation.. VENKATESH B vs JAYASHANKARA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation under the relevant heads required enhancement, including its assessment of multiplier, income and permanent disability.

The court held

The appeal was allowed in part.

It also directed

The Court enhanced total compensation from ₹3,20,700 to ₹5,76,700, entitling the claimant to an additional ₹2,56,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

The enhanced compensation was to be deposited by the insurer within six weeks.

No interest was payable on the enhanced ₹50,000 awarded for future medical expenses, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation with interest.

01Facts

The claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained in a road accident on 25 July 2023, alleging that the accident was caused by the negligent riding of a motorcycle.

¶ 3

The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded total compensation of ₹3,20,700, including ₹86,400 for loss of future earning capacity, and directed payment with 6% annual interest.

pp. 3–5 · ¶ 5

The claimant appealed, seeking enhancement.

¶ 5

02Issues

i.1. Whether the Tribunal’s assessment of compensation under the relevant heads required enhancement, including its assessment of multiplier, income and permanent disability.

¶ 7–12

ii.2. Whether the enhanced compensation was payable with interest, including the enhanced amount for future medical expenses.

¶ 15–17

03Law Applied

The Court applied the principle that the multiplier is selected by reference to the claimant’s completed age at the time of the accident; for a claimant aged 65, the applicable multiplier was 7.

¶ 7

It adopted the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority’s notional income of ₹16,250 per month for 2023.

¶ 8

For disability assessed in a lower limb, it treated one-third of the limb disability as whole-body disability.

¶ 11

The judgment cited no specific precedent; it exercised appellate jurisdiction under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act.

p. 2

Provisions in the judgment · 1 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173

04Reasoning

The Court found that the Tribunal had used a multiplier of 5 rather than 7 and had assessed whole-body disability at 9%, although the doctor had assessed 48% disability to the claimant’s left lower limb.

¶ 7–11

Applying the one-third approach, the Court used 16% whole-body disability and calculated future loss of earning capacity at ₹2,18,400 using the revised monthly income and multiplier.

¶ 7–11

It also enhanced pain-and-suffering compensation and loss of amenities, revised laid-up-period income using the updated notional income, and reassessed future medical expenses based on the doctor’s evidence.

¶ 10–12

It reduced the allowance for diet, nourishment, attendant and conveyance charges to ₹3,000, having regard to the three-day hospital admission.

¶ 10–12

05Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

¶ 13–18

The Court enhanced total compensation from ₹3,20,700 to ₹5,76,700, entitling the claimant to an additional ₹2,56,000, with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the petition until realization.

¶ 13–18

The enhanced compensation was to be deposited by the insurer within six weeks.

¶ 13–18

No interest was payable on the enhanced ₹50,000 awarded for future medical expenses, and the claimant was entitled to release of the entire enhanced compensation with interest.

¶ 13–18
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

VENKATESH BvsJAYASHANKARA

Karnataka High Court · October 12, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment