Madras High CourtAdministrative and Public LawProperty and Real Estate Law

Madras HC Dismisses Challenge To Plan To Grant House-Site Pattas To Homeless Poor On Disputed Pathway Land

KASTURIv.THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Madras HC Dismisses Challenge To Plan To Grant House-Site Pattas To Homeless Poor On Disputed Pathway Land. KASTURI vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU. Madras High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

1. Whether G.O. Ms. No. 138 dated 9 July 2025 should be quashed

The court held

The Court dismissed the writ petition, thereby declining to quash G.O. Ms. No. 138 or grant the requested direction concerning the pathway and encroachments.

It also directed

The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

01Facts

The petitioner sought to quash G.O. Ms. No. 138 dated 9 July 2025, published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, and to have a pathway restored to Pallikonda Town Panchayat control with encroachments removed.

p. 3

The State submitted a Tahsildar’s status report stating that proceedings were underway to change the land classification and issue house-site pattas to homeless persons, pursuant to G.O. (Ms.) No. 585 dated 20 July 2026.

pp. 3–4

The Court recorded that the Government had approved the proposal to grant pattas to those persons.

p. 4

02Issues

i.1. Whether G.O. Ms. No. 138 dated 9 July 2025 should be quashed

p. 3

ii.2. Whether the respondents should be directed to restore the pathway land to the Town Panchayat and remove encroachments

p. 3

03Law Applied

The petition was brought under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

p. 3

It records the Government’s approval of a proposal to grant house-site pattas under G.O. (Ms.) No. 585 dated 20 July 2026, but does not state a broader legal rule governing that approval.

p. 4

04Reasoning

The Court relied on the State’s submission and the Tahsildar’s status report that the Government had approved a proposal to grant pattas to homeless persons and that related proceedings were underway.

pp. 3–4

On that basis, it concluded that no further consideration of the petition was necessary. The judgment does not separately analyse the legality of G.O. Ms. No. 138 or the requested pathway restoration.

p. 4

05Holding

The Court dismissed the writ petition, thereby declining to quash G.O. Ms. No. 138 or grant the requested direction concerning the pathway and encroachments.

p. 4

The connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

p. 4
Madras High Court

Original Court PDF

KASTURIvsTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU

Madras High Court · November 11, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment