01Facts
The petitioners, Leading Firemen in the Tamil Nadu Fire and Rescue Services Department, sought revision of their seniority from 2000 based on marks obtained in the 1999–2000 selection process.
pp. 3–4The second respondent rejected their request by order dated 18 February 2026.
pp. 3–4The petitioners challenged that order under Article 226, seeking its quashing and a direction to revise the seniority list according to merit.
pp. 3–402Issues
i.1. Whether the petitioners were entitled to revision of their seniority from 2000 based on merit in the selection process
pp. 3–4ii.2. Whether the impugned rejection could stand in light of the Supreme Court’s directions concerning seniority lists finalized before and after 10 March 2003
pp. 4–603Law Applied
The Supreme Court, in Contempt Petition (Civil) Diary No. 6415 of 2021 etc., order dated 18 April 2023, directed that seniority lists finalized after 10 March 2003 be revisited according to merit as determined by the TNPSC.
pp. 4–6It also directed that lists finalized before that date, where seniority had been determined by roster or merit, should not be disturbed.
pp. 4–6The Supreme Court referred to the principles in Bimlesh Tanwar and the first Madras High Court judgment on the issue.
pp. 4–6The present judgment applied these directions to the petitioners’ request for revision from 2000.
pp. 4–604Reasoning
The petitioners sought a change to seniority arising from the 1999–2000 selection, whereas the Supreme Court’s directions expressly protected seniority lists finalized before 10 March 2003 from disturbance.
pp. 3–6The Court therefore concluded that the petitioners could not obtain the requested revision for 2000 and declined to entertain the writ petition.
pp. 3–605Holding
The Court dismissed the writ petition, declining to quash the order dated 18 February 2026 or direct revision of the petitioners’ seniority from 2000.
p. 6No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
p. 6Original Court PDF
S.ThangamariyappanvsThe Secretary,
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
