01Facts
The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to dispose of his application dated 15 September 2026, described in the prayer as an appeal under Section 80(a) and in the Court’s order as an appeal under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
p. 2The application challenged an inspection notice.
p. 3The first respondent submitted that the application was not maintainable because Section 80-A did not provide a remedy against an inspection notice.
p. 302Issues
i.1. Whether an application under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 is maintainable to challenge an inspection notice.
p. 3ii.2. Whether the Court should direct the first respondent to dispose of that application.
pp. 2–403Law Applied
Section 80-A(1) of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 empowers the Government, notwithstanding Section 80, to call for and examine the records of the appropriate planning authority concerning the sealing of premises under Section 56(2-A) or Section 57(4), and to modify, annul or reverse the relevant action or decision, or remit it for reconsideration.
p. 3The remedy is confined to the actions or decisions specified in that provision; an inspection notice is not among them.
p. 3No precedent was cited.
Provisions in the judgment · 4
Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 Section 80Section 80ASection 56Section 57
04Reasoning
The petitioner’s application challenged an inspection notice, rather than an order or action concerning the specified sealing of premises under Section 56(2-A) or Section 57(4).
p. 3Because Section 80-A did not provide a remedy against an inspection notice, the application was not maintainable.
pp. 3–4The Court therefore held that the requested mandamus to secure its disposal could not be granted.
pp. 3–405Holding
The Court held that the application under Section 80-A challenging the inspection notice was not maintainable and dismissed the writ petition.
pp. 3–4No costs were ordered, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
p. 4Original Court PDF
C.VEERAMANIvsTHE ADDITIONAL SECRETARY (TECHNICAL)
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
