Chhattisgarh High CourtCriminal Procedure and EvidenceCriminal Law

Man Accused Of Introducing Steel Trader To Co-Accused Gets Anticipatory Bail In ₹5.27-Crore Unpaid Steel Bill Case: Chhattisgarh HC

BIPIN RATURIv.STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Man Accused Of Introducing Steel Trader To Co-Accused Gets Anticipatory Bail In ₹5.27-Crore Unpaid Steel Bill Case: Chhattisgarh HC. BIPIN RATURI vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH. Chhattisgarh High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0317/2026, having regard to the allegations and the role attributed to him.

The court held

The application was allowed.

It also directed

The Court directed that, in the event of arrest in Crime No. 0317/2026, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses or the investigation, conduct consistent with a fair and expeditious trial, and appearance before the trial court on each date.

A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court.

01Facts

The complainant, through SJM Minerals, supplied 2,437.810 MT of steel billets worth ₹12,63,72,632 to buyers in Gujarat pursuant to a purchase order issued by Bolster Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. Of that amount, ₹7,36,18,158 was paid, leaving ₹5,27,54,474 outstanding.

¶ 1–2

The complainant alleged that the applicant introduced him to co-accused Anil Rai and suspected a planned cheating scheme after Anil Rai stopped responding; the FIR was registered under Sections 318(4), 317(4), 111(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1–2

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, submitting that his role was limited to introducing the parties and that the dispute arose from a business transaction.

¶ 3

The State and objector opposed the application, relying on the applicant’s role in arranging and attending a meeting and the complainant’s subsequent request that he intervene over the unpaid balance.

¶ 4–5

02Issues

i.Whether the applicant was entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0317/2026, having regard to the allegations and the role attributed to him.

¶ 7–8

ii.Whether the applicant’s alleged involvement in introducing the complainant to the co-accused and arranging a meeting warranted custodial arrest despite the transaction being partly paid.

¶ 7–8

03Law Applied

Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides for a direction for grant of bail to a person apprehending arrest.

¶ 1

The alleged offences were under Sections 318(4), 317(4), 111(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

¶ 1

The Court stated no precedent or further legal test; it considered the facts and circumstances, nature of the allegations and transaction, and the role attributed to the applicant in deciding whether to grant anticipatory bail.

¶ 8

Provisions in the judgment · 5 · Linked ones open on LawLens

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 318Section 317Section 111Section 3

04Reasoning

The Court noted that the applicant had arranged a meeting pursuant to which the complainant supplied goods worth approximately ₹12 crore to the co-accused, but approximately ₹7 crore had been paid and the balance remained unpaid.

¶ 7

Considering the nature of the transaction and the role attributed to the applicant, the Court concluded that anticipatory bail was appropriate, without expressing any view on the merits of the case.

¶ 8

05Holding

The application was allowed.

¶ 9

The Court directed that, in the event of arrest in Crime No. 0317/2026, the applicant be released on anticipatory bail on executing a personal bond of ₹25,000 with one surety for the like amount, subject to conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses or the investigation, conduct consistent with a fair and expeditious trial, and appearance before the trial court on each date.

¶ 9

A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court.

¶ 10
Chhattisgarh High Court

Original Court PDF

BIPIN RATURIvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH

Chhattisgarh High Court · October 27, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment