01Facts
The applicants were arrested on 14 July 2026 in connection with Crime No. 67/2026, registered at Police Station Purur under Sections 115(2), 121(1), 126(2), 132, 191(2), 191(3), 221, 262, 263, 296 and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
¶ 2The prosecution alleged that, when police went to arrest Applicant No. 1 in a separate NDPS case, the applicants and others obstructed the arrest and manhandled police personnel, injuring an Assistant Sub-Inspector.
¶ 2The applicants sought regular bail, asserting that they were falsely implicated, that the charge-sheet had been filed, and that Applicant No. 1 had obtained bail in the NDPS case.
¶ 3–4The State opposed bail, alleging obstruction and assault on police personnel, but did not dispute that the charge-sheet had been filed.
¶ 3–402Issues
i.1. Whether the applicants should be released on regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, having regard to the allegations, period of pre-trial detention, filing of the charge-sheet, and expected duration of trial.
¶ 1, 3–603Law Applied
The application was considered under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, which provides the basis for the High Court’s exercise of jurisdiction over regular bail applications.
¶ 1In deciding the application, the Court considered the facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations, the period of pre-trial detention, and the likely time required to conclude the trial.
¶ 6Provisions in the judgment · 17 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483Section 84Section 351
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 12 provisions
Section 115Section 121Section 126Section 132Section 191Section 221Section 262Section 263Section 296Section 351Section 269Section 209Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 20Section 8
04Reasoning
The Court considered the competing submissions, including the alleged obstruction of police and injury to an officer, alongside the applicants’ detention since 14 July 2026, the filing of the charge-sheet, and the prospect that trial would take considerable time.
¶ 3–6On that basis, and without expressing any opinion on the merits, it found it appropriate to grant bail.
¶ 3–605Holding
The High Court allowed the bail application and directed the applicants’ release on personal bonds of ₹25,000 each, with one surety in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the trial court.
¶ 7Bail was subject to conditions concerning adjournments, attendance, appearance on specified trial dates, and consequences for failure to comply.
¶ 7(a)–(d)A certified copy was directed to be sent to the trial court for information and compliance.
¶ 8Original Court PDF
AMIT KORRAMvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
