01Facts
The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), apprehending arrest in Crime No. 1164/2026, registered under Sections 115(2), 296, 351(3), 74 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS).
¶ 1The complainant alleged that, while employed at the applicants’ spa, she was subjected to inappropriate touching and, when she went to collect unpaid salary on 25 August 2026, Applicant No. 1 allegedly touched and assaulted her, took her phone, and abused her.
¶ 2The applicants denied the allegations and claimed they arose after the complainant was dismissed for unsatisfactory work; they also submitted that they had no other criminal antecedents.
¶ 3The State opposed bail, referring to allegations of inappropriate touching by both applicants, but did not dispute the absence of other criminal antecedents.
¶ 402Issues
i.Whether the applicants should be granted anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 1164/2026.
¶ 1, 5–6ii.If anticipatory bail is granted, what conditions should govern the applicants’ release?
¶ 703Law Applied
The application was considered under Section 482 of the BNSS, which provides for anticipatory bail.
¶ 1The alleged offences were registered under Sections 115(2), 296, 351(3), 74 and 3(5) of the BNS.
¶ 1The Court identified no precedent or more detailed legal test; it stated that its decision rested on the facts and circumstances, the nature of the allegations, the parties’ submissions, and the absence of other criminal antecedents.
¶ 6Provisions in the judgment · 6 · Linked ones open on LawLens
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115Section 296Section 351Section 74Section 3
04Reasoning
Having heard both sides and considered the material on record, the Court weighed the allegations against the applicants’ submissions and the absence of other criminal antecedents.
¶ 5–6Without expressing any view on the merits, it concluded that these considerations warranted anticipatory bail.
¶ 6The Court imposed conditions requiring the applicants to be available for interrogation, refrain from influencing persons acquainted with the case, avoid conduct prejudicial to a fair and expeditious trial, and attend each trial-court date.
¶ 705Holding
The Court allowed the anticipatory-bail application.
¶ 7In the event of arrest in Crime No. 1164/2026, the applicants are to be released on a personal bond of ₹25,000 each, with one surety each for the like sum, subject to the conditions specified in the order.
¶ 7Original Court PDF
LOKESH SENvsSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
