Facts
The applicant, an Assistant Branch Post Master (ABPM), was placed under "deemed put-off duty" from August 10, 2018, to June 14, 2019
Source reference: p. 2This action followed criminal proceedings in which the applicant was subsequently found not guilty by the Assistant Sessions Court, Kottarakara, via a judgment dated March 26, 2025 (Annexure A3)
Source reference: p. 2-3Following his acquittal, the applicant submitted a representation on September 2, 2025 (Annexure A4) to the 4th Respondent (the Engaging Authority) seeking redress regarding the period of put-off duty
Source reference: p. 2The applicant approached the Tribunal aggrieved by the failure of the 4th Respondent to consider or dispose of said representation
Source reference: p. 2Issues
Whether the 4th Respondent is required to consider and dispose of the applicant’s representation regarding his put-off duty period following his acquittal in criminal proceedings.
Source reference: p. 2-3Law Applied
Rule 12(3) of the GDS (Conduct Engagement) Rules, 2011 and 2020 (Annexures A5 and A6), which govern the "put-off duty" status of Gramin Dak Sevaks
Source reference: p. 4The matter was adjudicated based on the principles of administrative law requiring authorities to timely dispose of statutory representations.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Tribunal noted that the applicant had been acquitted of the criminal charges that presumably led to his put-off duty
Source reference: p. 2It observed that despite a formal representation (Annexure A4) being submitted to the Engaging Authority on September 2, 2025, no action had been taken by the respondents
Source reference: p. 2Without delving into the merits of the acquittal or the specifics of the put-off duty period, the Tribunal determined that the administrative authority had a duty to consider the applicant's grievance in light of the judicial pronouncement in his favor
Source reference: p. 3Consequently, the Tribunal found it appropriate to issue a time-bound direction to the 4th Respondent to ensure administrative accountability
Source reference: p. 3Holding
The court held that the Engaging Authority must finalize the matter through a formal order within the specified timeline
The Tribunal disposed of the Original Application at the admission stage without costs. It directed the 4th Respondent to consider and dispose of the applicant's representation (Annexure A4) within 15 days from the date of receipt of the order
Source reference: p. 3Original Court PDF
Santhosh SolomonvsDEPARTMENT OF POSTS
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in