Karnataka High CourtEmployment and Labour LawAdministrative and Public Law

Married daughters seeking compassionate appointment must establish dependency on the deceased government servant.

SMT ANUSHA Sv.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Married daughters seeking compassionate appointment must establish dependency on the deceased government servant.. SMT ANUSHA S vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
The LawLens card for this judgmentXLinkedInWhatsApp

In brief

The question

Whether the petitioner established that she was dependent on her deceased mother, as required to qualify for compassionate appointment under the applicable rules.

The court held

The High Court held that the petitioner had not established dependency on her deceased mother and found no error or illegality in the rejection endorsements or the Tribunal’s order.

It also directed

It dismissed the writ petition.

01Facts

The petitioner, a married daughter of a Commercial Tax Officer who died in service on 5 May 2021, sought compassionate appointment after her father relinquished his claim.

pp. 2–4

The Department rejected her application on the ground that she was not dependent on her mother at the time of her death, including because she was living with her husband.

pp. 2–4

The petitioner challenged the rejection endorsements before the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, which dismissed her application on 10 March 2025. She then challenged the Tribunal’s order and the endorsements before the High Court.

pp. 2–4

02Issues

i.Whether the petitioner established that she was dependent on her deceased mother, as required to qualify for compassionate appointment under the applicable rules.

pp. 5–8

ii.Whether the Tribunal or the respondent authorities committed an error warranting interference with their decisions rejecting the petitioner’s claim.

pp. 6–9

03Law Applied

Under Rule 3 of the Karnataka Civil Services (Appointment on Compassionate Grounds) Rules, 1996, compassionate appointment is not claimable as a matter of right or granted as a matter of course.

pp. 6–7

Rule 4 requires the claimant to establish dependency and financial crisis or destitution, including that income from all sources does not exceed the prescribed limit.

pp. 6–7

The 2021 amendment permits married daughters to claim compassionate appointment, but they must still establish dependency on the deceased government servant.

pp. 6–7

04Reasoning

The Court accepted that a married daughter may seek compassionate appointment under the amended Rules, but held that the amendment did not dispense with the requirement to prove dependency.

pp. 7–9

Although the petitioner asserted that she had lived with and cared for her mother, she produced no cogent material establishing that assertion.

pp. 7–9

The residential certificate and police verification filed by the State before the Tribunal indicated that, after marriage, she lived with her husband at a different place.

pp. 7–9

The Court therefore found no basis to disturb the authorities’ assessment or the Tribunal’s decision.

pp. 7–9

05Holding

The High Court held that the petitioner had not established dependency on her deceased mother and found no error or illegality in the rejection endorsements or the Tribunal’s order.

pp. 8–9

It dismissed the writ petition.

pp. 8–9
Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SMT ANUSHA SvsTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Karnataka High Court · September 29, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment