Facts
The prosecution alleged that the petitioner abducted the victim, who was then approximately 16 years and 5 months old, took her to Kollur and married her, and thereafter subjected her to sexual assault and confinement
Source reference: p. 3–4The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody; after the investigation was completed and a charge-sheet filed, he sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Source reference: p. 4–5The case was registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) and 127(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; Sections 6, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012; and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006
Source reference: p. 2–3Issues
1. Whether the petitioner should be enlarged on bail in light of the victim’s age, the allegations, and the material collected during investigation
Source reference: p. 5–72. Whether the petitioner’s custody, completion of investigation, and the anticipated duration of trial justified release subject to conditions
Source reference: p. 7–8Law Applied
The petitioner invoked Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, corresponding to Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as the provision for seeking bail from the High Court
Source reference: p. 2The alleged offences arose under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, and the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006
Source reference: p. 2–3The Court applied its discretion to grant bail subject to conditions addressing attendance at trial, interference with prosecution witnesses, and further offending
Source reference: p. 7–8No precedent was cited.
Source reference: no citationReasoning
The Court noted that the victim was a minor and that the medical record recorded the absence of the hymen
Source reference: p. 5, 7It also considered the asserted contradictions between the victim’s statements, the Court’s observation that her statement under Section 183 of the BNSS did not allege repeated aggravated penetrative sexual assault by the petitioner, and the petitioner’s six months in custody
Source reference: p. 4–7With the investigation complete, the charge-sheet filed, and trial likely to take time, the Court found that bail could be granted subject to stringent conditions
Source reference: p. 5, 7–8Holding
The Court allowed the petition and ordered the petitioner’s release on bail in the pending case on execution of a personal bond of ₹2,00,000 with two sureties for the like sum
He must not threaten or tamper with prosecution witnesses, attend the trial court as required, and refrain from similar or other offences; breach of any condition may lead the prosecution to seek cancellation of bail
Source reference: p. 8Acts & Sections Cited
13 provisions across 5 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Code of Criminal Procedure, 19733
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20232
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 20234
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 20123
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 20061
Original Court PDF
HANUMANTHAPPA M.B. S/O MALAKAPPA BELAVANERvsSTATE OF KARNATAKA
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
