Facts
Respondent No. 2 lodged FIR No. 0611/2021 at P.S. Ambedkar Nagar under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, alleging dowry-related harassment, cruelty, assault and threats by her husband and in-laws
Source reference: pp. 1–2, para. 3The parties, who had been living separately since 23 September 2019, settled their disputes before the Family Court Counselling Cell on 28 May 2025. They subsequently obtained a divorce, and petitioner No. 1 paid the agreed sum of ₹3,50,000 in full and final settlement
Source reference: p. 2, para. 4In this petition under Section 528 BNSS, respondent No. 2 confirmed the voluntary settlement, receipt of the full amount and her no-objection to quashing the FIR
Source reference: p. 3, paras. 5–6Issues
1. Whether the High Court should exercise its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to quash the FIR and consequential proceedings in light of the parties’ settlement.
Source reference: pp. 1, 3, paras. 1, 6–82. Whether continuation of the criminal proceedings would serve a useful purpose where the matrimonial dispute had been amicably resolved and the complainant did not wish to pursue the charges.
Source reference: p. 3, para. 7Law Applied
Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita empowers the High Court to exercise inherent jurisdiction to secure the ends of justice.
Source reference: pp. 1, 3, paras. 1, 7–8It stated that, in the circumstances before it, quashing was appropriate where the dispute was primarily private, the parties had settled it, and the complainant no longer wished to press the charges
Source reference: pp. 1, 3, paras. 1, 7–8Reasoning
The Court found that the parties had amicably resolved their matrimonial disputes, obtained a divorce, and completed payment of the settlement amount. Respondent No. 2 personally confirmed that the settlement was voluntary and that she had no objection to quashing the FIR
Source reference: pp. 2–3, paras. 4–6Because the dispute was private in nature and the complainant did not wish to pursue the charges, the Court concluded that continuing the criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose and that quashing would secure the ends of justice
Source reference: p. 3, paras. 7–8Holding
The Court allowed the petition and quashed FIR No. 0611/2021, dated 1 November 2021, registered under Sections 498A/406/506/34 IPC, together with all consequential proceedings
It directed that the parties’ original affidavits be submitted to the Trial Court and to the concerned SHO/IO within four weeks
Source reference: pp. 3–4, para. 9Pending applications, if any, were also disposed of
Source reference: p. 4, para. 11Acts & Sections Cited
4 provisions across 2 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231
Indian Penal Code, 18603
Original Court PDF
Jatin Kumar Verma & Ors.vsThe State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) & Anr.
Click to open original judgment
Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in
