Karnataka High Court
Criminal LawFamily Law

Matrimonial criminal proceedings may be quashed upon the spouses’ voluntary settlement.

SHASHI VARUN S.M. vs MRS. VIDYASHREE K.G.

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 01, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Matrimonial criminal proceedings may be quashed upon the spouses’ voluntary settlement.. SHASHI VARUN S.M. vs MRS. VIDYASHREE K.G.. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The wife lodged a complaint leading to Crime No.129/2022 against her husband and his relatives, alleging offences under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 498A read with Section 34 of the IPC.

Source reference: p.2–4

The husband and relatives sought quashing of the criminal proceedings; the husband also challenged an order made in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.700/2022 before the Family Court.

Source reference: p.2–4

In the connected writ petition, the parties filed a compromise agreeing to pay the wife ₹1 crore in four instalments, withdraw their allegations and pending cases, and dissolve their marriage.

Source reference: p.5–6
02

Issues

1. Whether the criminal proceedings in Crime No.129/2022 should be quashed in view of the parties’ settlement.

Source reference: p.5–7

2. Whether the challenged Family Court order should be set aside and the parties’ agreed arrangements concerning divorce and the settlement amount given effect.

Source reference: p.5–8
03

Law Applied

The Court considered the parties’ compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and exercised its criminal quashing and writ jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

Source reference: p.3–6

The judgment cites no precedent. It accepted the parties’ settlement as the basis for quashing the criminal prosecution and issuing consequential directions.

Source reference: p.3–6
04

Reasoning

The parties appeared with counsel and jointly confirmed the settlement, including the ₹1 crore payment, withdrawal of claims and pending proceedings, and their agreement to dissolve the marriage.

Source reference: p.5–8

The Court took the compromise on record and, on that basis, quashed the criminal prosecution against the husband and his relatives and set aside the Family Court order.

Source reference: p.5–8

Having noted the interests of the wife and the minor child, it directed that the full settlement amount be placed in a fixed deposit in their joint names until the child attains majority, or invested in property in their joint names if the wife so chooses.

Source reference: p.5–8
05

Holding

The Court allowed Criminal Petition No.9537/2022 and Writ Petition Nos.33244/2025 and 33348/2025.

It quashed the prosecution in Crime No.129/2022, set aside the order dated 25 March 2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.700/2022, and directed the parties to obtain a divorce decree in M.C.No.4274/2021 after payment of the full settlement amount.

Source reference: p.6–8

The Family Court was directed to grant the decree subject to that payment; the settlement funds were to be protected for the wife and minor child as directed.

Source reference: p.6–8
06

Acts & Sections Cited

5 provisions across 4 statutes referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731

Dowry Prohibition Act, 19612

Indian Penal Code, 18601

Code of Civil Procedure, 19081

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

SHASHI VARUN S.M.vsMRS. VIDYASHREE K.G.

Karnataka High Court · October 01, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment