Karnataka High Court
Civil LawInsurance Law

Medical expenses reimbursed under a health insurance policy cannot be deducted from motor accident compensation.

ANASUYAMMA, vs VIKAS H M

Karnataka High CourtJUDGMENT: October 08, 20262 MIN READSOURCE JUDGMENT
Medical expenses reimbursed under a health insurance policy cannot be deducted from motor accident compensation.. ANASUYAMMA, vs VIKAS H M. Karnataka High Court. LawLens
THE ORIGINAL LAWLENS SUMMARY
01

Facts

The claimant sustained an open fracture of the ulna and radius in a road traffic accident on 17 March 2022 involving a car allegedly driven rashly and negligently by respondent No. 1.

Source reference: p. 3; para. 3; p. 4; para. 6

The Tribunal awarded ₹1,95,846, including ₹20,000 for pain and suffering, ₹20,000 for loss of amenities, ₹15,000 for loss of earnings during treatment, and ₹93,846 in medical expenses; it disallowed a further ₹1,80,623 in medical expenses on the ground that the claimant had received reimbursement from Star Health Insurance.

Source reference: p. 3; para. 3; p. 5; para. 9

The claimant appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement.

Source reference: p. 2; appeal description; p. 2; para. 1
02

Issues

1. Whether the compensation awarded for pain and suffering, loss of amenities, and loss of income during the laid-up period required enhancement in view of the claimant’s injuries.

Source reference: p. 4; paras. 6–7

2. Whether medical expenses reimbursed under the claimant’s health insurance policy could be deducted from the compensation payable.

Source reference: p. 5; para. 9
03

Law Applied

Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, provides for an appeal against an award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Source reference: p. 2; appeal description

The Court relied on New India Assurance Company Limited v. Dolly Satish Gandhi and another, 2026 LiveLaw (SC) 504, for the rule that medical expenses reimbursed under a separate insurance policy cannot be deducted when assessing compensation for accident-related medical expenses.

Source reference: p. 5; para. 9

The Court also assessed compensation by reference to the proved injuries, period of treatment and recovery, and medical expenses.

Source reference: pp. 4–5; paras. 6–9
04

Reasoning

Given the claimant’s open fractures, the Court found the Tribunal’s awards for pain and suffering and loss of amenities inadequate, increasing them to ₹80,000 and ₹60,000 respectively.

Source reference: p. 4; para. 6

It considered two months’ rest appropriate and awarded ₹31,000 for loss of income during the laid-up period.

Source reference: p. 4; para. 7

It upheld the ₹47,000 awarded for attendant, conveyance, food, and nourishment expenses, having regard to the 23-day hospital admission.

Source reference: p. 5; para. 8

Applying the cited Supreme Court decision, it included the ₹1,80,623 reimbursed by the claimant’s health insurer in the medical-expense award, bringing total medical expenses to ₹2,74,469.

Source reference: p. 5; para. 9
05

Holding

The appeal was allowed in part.

The Court fixed total compensation at ₹4,92,469, an enhancement of ₹2,96,623 over the Tribunal’s award.

Source reference: p. 6; paras. 10–11

The enhanced sum carries interest at 6% per annum from the date of the claim petition until realization, except for the 330-day delay period in filing the appeal. The insurer was directed to deposit the enhanced compensation with interest before the Tribunal within six weeks, and the claimant was permitted to withdraw the entire enhanced compensation.

Source reference: pp. 6–7; para. 12
06

Acts & Sections Cited

1 provisions across 1 statute referred to in this judgment. Each provision opens on LawLens.

Motor Vehicles Act, 19881

Karnataka High Court

Original Court PDF

ANASUYAMMA,vsVIKAS H M

Karnataka High Court · October 08, 2026

Click to open original judgment

Original judgment, available to read, download and summarize on LawLens.in

Click to open original judgment